What is better for gaming perfomance?

Any hardware related topics go here.
juDge
Registered User
Posts: 595
Joined: 27 Dec 2005, 02:00
Location: Cape Town
Contact:

What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by juDge »

Im torn between 2x2GB Corsair DDR3 XMS gaming memory OR 2x4GB Corsair ValueSelect memory..

Speed vs quantity...which one? 8)
Intel Corei5 2500 3.3GHZ
8GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333mhz Ram
Asus P8H67-M Motherboard
MSI 570GTX-Twin-Frozr-III Power Edition OC
Coollermaster HAF 922 Case
Coollermaster Extreme 550w PSU
Samsung 24" LED S24A350H 2ms
RuadRauFlessa
Registered User
Posts: 20576
Joined: 19 Sep 2003, 02:00
Location: Bloodbank

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by RuadRauFlessa »

If you OC the first if you don't the second.
OC = SPEED
NON-OC = QUANTITY
:rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :rock:
Spoiler (show)
Intel Core i7-2600k @ 3.4GHz
Corsair Vengence 2x4GB DDR3 2000MHz
Thermaltake Toughpower 850W
ASUS nVidia GTX560 1GB
CoolerMaster HAF 932
juDge
Registered User
Posts: 595
Joined: 27 Dec 2005, 02:00
Location: Cape Town
Contact:

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by juDge »

RuadRauFlessa wrote:If you OC the first if you don't the second.
OC = SPEED
NON-OC = QUANTITY
Make sense :D

Thanks!
Intel Corei5 2500 3.3GHZ
8GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333mhz Ram
Asus P8H67-M Motherboard
MSI 570GTX-Twin-Frozr-III Power Edition OC
Coollermaster HAF 922 Case
Coollermaster Extreme 550w PSU
Samsung 24" LED S24A350H 2ms
Slimshaedy
Registered User
Posts: 673
Joined: 11 Aug 2010, 15:32
Location: Durban, Pinetown
Contact:

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by Slimshaedy »

For gaming 4GB is more than enough! 8GB is overkill I rate
[i7 2600K @ 4.6 ghz 1.35V] [Asus P8P67 Deluxe] [G-Skill RipjawsX 2x2GB DDR3 1600 CL6 (6-8-6-24) 1.5V]
[Sapphire Radeon 6870 @ 975/1200 1.2V] [Coolermaster V6 GT] [WD Caviar Black 640GB SATA3 6Gbps]
[Samsung SA350 23" LED] [NZXT Phantom White] [Corsair TX750W V2] [Zalman RS6F-USB 5.1 Surround Sound Headphones] My rig and benchmarks
juDge
Registered User
Posts: 595
Joined: 27 Dec 2005, 02:00
Location: Cape Town
Contact:

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by juDge »

Slimshaedy wrote:For gaming 4GB is more than enough! 8GB is overkill I rate
No such thing as too much ram dude! 8)
Intel Corei5 2500 3.3GHZ
8GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333mhz Ram
Asus P8H67-M Motherboard
MSI 570GTX-Twin-Frozr-III Power Edition OC
Coollermaster HAF 922 Case
Coollermaster Extreme 550w PSU
Samsung 24" LED S24A350H 2ms
Slimshaedy
Registered User
Posts: 673
Joined: 11 Aug 2010, 15:32
Location: Durban, Pinetown
Contact:

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by Slimshaedy »

That's right haha but that money would be better spent on a new monitor:)
[i7 2600K @ 4.6 ghz 1.35V] [Asus P8P67 Deluxe] [G-Skill RipjawsX 2x2GB DDR3 1600 CL6 (6-8-6-24) 1.5V]
[Sapphire Radeon 6870 @ 975/1200 1.2V] [Coolermaster V6 GT] [WD Caviar Black 640GB SATA3 6Gbps]
[Samsung SA350 23" LED] [NZXT Phantom White] [Corsair TX750W V2] [Zalman RS6F-USB 5.1 Surround Sound Headphones] My rig and benchmarks
StarBound
Registered Pervert
Posts: 6879
Joined: 30 Jul 2004, 02:00
Processor: Intel i7 4790k
Motherboard: MSI Z97 Gaming 7
Graphics card: MSI GTX780Ti Gaming
Memory: G.Skill Sniper 1866mhz 16GB
Location: The Greater Unknown
Contact:

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by StarBound »

I've got 8gb. Disable pagefile with that amount and you wont get any disc swapping. Too bad some games needs a pagefile for no damn reason.

Still as said:
If you OC the first if you don't the second.
OC = SPEED
NON-OC = QUANTITY
You could also go and say 8GB = no disc swap and take that as the better option.
My Steam Screenshots

I lived the dream ...then my PC died.
juDge
Registered User
Posts: 595
Joined: 27 Dec 2005, 02:00
Location: Cape Town
Contact:

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by juDge »

StarBound wrote:I've got 8gb. Disable pagefile with that amount and you wont get any disc swapping. Too bad some games needs a pagefile for no damn reason.

Still as said:
If you OC the first if you don't the second.
OC = SPEED
NON-OC = QUANTITY
You could also go and say 8GB = no disc swap and take that as the better option.
So disabling the pagefile with 8GB memory speeds up system performance?
Intel Corei5 2500 3.3GHZ
8GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333mhz Ram
Asus P8H67-M Motherboard
MSI 570GTX-Twin-Frozr-III Power Edition OC
Coollermaster HAF 922 Case
Coollermaster Extreme 550w PSU
Samsung 24" LED S24A350H 2ms
GDI_Lord
Forum Administrator
Posts: 2663
Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 02:00

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by GDI_Lord »

+1 StarBound.

@juDge: Yes, in the vast majority of cases it does.
Important Thread: Yours in Christ's service,
JollyJamma
Registered User
Posts: 446
Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 09:02

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by JollyJamma »

No they did a test a while ago. disabling the pagefile does improve performance over say a 1gig pagefile but the best was a small pagefile of about 512 megs. Dunno why but the results speak for themselves.

More is better than faster but if you buy more faster later on it's great.
I no longer think of myself as Atheist however I reject religion as a concept where you must do x because someone says so. May contain nuts.
KALSTER
Forum Moderator
Posts: 5439
Joined: 12 Oct 2008, 02:08

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by KALSTER »

+1

Personally, I'd go quantity every time, as the speed gains are not as profound as one might think. Only a few frames at most AFAIK.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle
Intel i5 2500; AsRock Z77 Extreme 4; Asus GTX580; 4x 2GB DDR3 1333; Intel 520 240GB SSD + 2x WD 3TB + 2TB Samsung; Samsung 22X DVD/RW; 23" LG W2343T-PF; Huntkey 700W
GDI_Lord
Forum Administrator
Posts: 2663
Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 02:00

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by GDI_Lord »

+1 Kalster
Important Thread: Yours in Christ's service,
Hman
Registered User
Posts: 28520
Joined: 06 Oct 2003, 02:00
Processor: Intel i5 650
Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M LX
Graphics card: Gigabyte 7850 2GB OC
Memory: 8GB Kingston DDR3
Location: In my skin
Contact:

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by Hman »

I remember way back when 512MB DDR modules were good stuff. Was running a 512MB module in my pc and later installed another. The performance improvement was instantly visible, much more so than switching from SDRAM to DDR.

Moral of the story: "Gaming" ram (or whatever you want to call it) is only better if you are more into running benchmarks or overclocking than actually playing a game or doing some work on your pc. You get more bang for your buck out of putting more ram in.
"Every thinking man is a drinking man."


Member of the Barberton Tigers
GDI_Lord
Forum Administrator
Posts: 2663
Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 02:00

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by GDI_Lord »

I also remember a similar story Hman.
Important Thread: Yours in Christ's service,
JollyJamma
Registered User
Posts: 446
Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 09:02

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by JollyJamma »

I just see stats everywhere with less amounts of hellishly expensive RAM marginally out pacing more cheaper RAM.

Plus there's something awesome about a system that doesn't stick when you have a billion apps open.
I need 8gigs just to make my PC smooth. It's annoying.

I would kill to go SB with 12gigs of RAM and I would do it if I had the cash.
I no longer think of myself as Atheist however I reject religion as a concept where you must do x because someone says so. May contain nuts.
juDge
Registered User
Posts: 595
Joined: 27 Dec 2005, 02:00
Location: Cape Town
Contact:

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by juDge »

I was going to get the 2x4GB corsair value select but the 2x4GB corsair xms memory is R200 more in total :D
Intel Corei5 2500 3.3GHZ
8GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333mhz Ram
Asus P8H67-M Motherboard
MSI 570GTX-Twin-Frozr-III Power Edition OC
Coollermaster HAF 922 Case
Coollermaster Extreme 550w PSU
Samsung 24" LED S24A350H 2ms
User avatar
THE_STIG
Spoiled Brat
Posts: 11762
Joined: 26 Aug 2010, 20:33
Processor: Core i7 6800k
Motherboard: Asrock x99 taichi
Graphics card: Zotac 1080ti amp extreme
Memory: 16gb(4x4gb) corsair vengeance
Location: Some say.......

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by THE_STIG »

In that case go for the XMS memory
RuadRauFlessa
Registered User
Posts: 20576
Joined: 19 Sep 2003, 02:00
Location: Bloodbank

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by RuadRauFlessa »

JollyJamma wrote:I would kill to go SB with 12gigs of RAM and I would do it if I had the cash.
You sir are giving me ideas :D
:rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :rock:
Spoiler (show)
Intel Core i7-2600k @ 3.4GHz
Corsair Vengence 2x4GB DDR3 2000MHz
Thermaltake Toughpower 850W
ASUS nVidia GTX560 1GB
CoolerMaster HAF 932
KALSTER
Forum Moderator
Posts: 5439
Joined: 12 Oct 2008, 02:08

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by KALSTER »

juDge wrote:I was going to get the 2x4GB corsair value select but the 2x4GB corsair xms memory is R200 more in total :D
They do look cooler. :)
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle
Intel i5 2500; AsRock Z77 Extreme 4; Asus GTX580; 4x 2GB DDR3 1333; Intel 520 240GB SSD + 2x WD 3TB + 2TB Samsung; Samsung 22X DVD/RW; 23" LG W2343T-PF; Huntkey 700W
juDge
Registered User
Posts: 595
Joined: 27 Dec 2005, 02:00
Location: Cape Town
Contact:

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by juDge »

KALSTER wrote:
juDge wrote:I was going to get the 2x4GB corsair value select but the 2x4GB corsair xms memory is R200 more in total :D
They do look cooler. :)
Haha yes exactly why I am going for them, doubt there is ANY performance difference :lol:
Intel Corei5 2500 3.3GHZ
8GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333mhz Ram
Asus P8H67-M Motherboard
MSI 570GTX-Twin-Frozr-III Power Edition OC
Coollermaster HAF 922 Case
Coollermaster Extreme 550w PSU
Samsung 24" LED S24A350H 2ms
JollyJamma
Registered User
Posts: 446
Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 09:02

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by JollyJamma »

RuadRauFlessa wrote:
JollyJamma wrote:I would kill to go SB with 12gigs of RAM and I would do it if I had the cash.
You sir are giving me ideas :D
Don't say I don't give you anything.

12gigs of RAM would about do it for most people and is too much RAM but that's never a bad thing.
If a CPU be the muscle the RAM is the lungs, the GPU is the eyes and the hard drive is the...well I can't say in a family forum but you get the picture.
I no longer think of myself as Atheist however I reject religion as a concept where you must do x because someone says so. May contain nuts.
User avatar
rustypup
Registered User
Posts: 8872
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 02:00
Location: nullus pixius demonica
Contact:

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by rustypup »

Slimshaedy wrote:That's right haha but that money would be better spent on a new SSD
FTFY...

honestly... more RAM is fine, but for a serious performance boost take care of that slow as treacle HDD...
Most people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so - Bertrand Russel
The_Jelly
Registered User
Posts: 423
Joined: 13 Aug 2010, 22:37

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by The_Jelly »

rustypup wrote:
Slimshaedy wrote:That's right haha but that money would be better spent on a new SSD
FTFY...

honestly... more RAM is fine, but for a serious performance boost take care of that slow as treacle HDD...
Well that would depend on what the judge does more.... if he is purely gaming id do what slim suggested and get a monitor as i read in his other post that he had a 1050p monitor...An SSD will only boost loading times in game and will offer little or no performance boost once the game has loaded the level into the memory... u will see an improvment in certain online games apparently... but if its not just for gaming then ssd ftw!
i7 950 @ 4ghz 1.3v| Zalman CNPS 10x extreme Cooler | Asus Rampage III extreme | 6gb corsair dominator 1600 (7-8-7-20) | Asus gtx 560 Ti Direct Cu II SLI| Corsair Tx 750W | Coolermaster Cm690II Advanced | 640Gb WD Black Sata 3 6gb/s |
GDI_Lord
Forum Administrator
Posts: 2663
Joined: 05 Sep 2005, 02:00

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by GDI_Lord »

@Jolly: fat reserves

FTFY?

+1 Jelly
Important Thread: Yours in Christ's service,
User avatar
rustypup
Registered User
Posts: 8872
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 02:00
Location: nullus pixius demonica
Contact:

Re: What is better for gaming perfomance?

Post by rustypup »

The_Jelly wrote:An SSD will only boost loading times in game and will offer little or no performance boost once the game has loaded the level into the memory..
unless it was managing the paging file... in which case?
Most people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so - Bertrand Russel
Post Reply