I'll probably get the usual flak for this post such as "could you do a better job?" or "but they're on a tight schedule", but the fact of the matter is that the following are not things that I expect to see in a magazine done by professionals.
The DVD
I was under the impression that the DVD gets checked at least once before the master copy is sent off for duplication. Obviously this isn't the case. If it were, then maybe the auturun file on the DVD would point to the correct executable to autorun. As is, my computer has no clue what to do with the DVD. Sure, I can browse it, but that defies the point of an autorun script.
Cameron's Spot
Cameron speaks of the site update, but nothing new on this site that I see. Given, he did explain that it would be up in a few days, so that's fine
Editor's Letter
I can't even begin to express my disappointment at this person who calls herself an editor:
Oh really? Strange that I don't see anything here. I'd call this a very big let-down for people that have visited the site once or twice, didn't like it, and never came back. Now, apparently the site's been revamped, but alas, nothing new here... Move along.Stacey wrote:Point your browser on over to our new-look website at www.pcformat.co.za - She's a beauty, if we do say so ourselves!
Have you even seen the new look, so as to so proudly claim that it's a beauty?
I'm sorry? So now it's for us to decide which CPU is best? What exactly is the point of buying PCF if not for you to tell us? If, on the other hand, "deciding for ourselves" means being able to read the 90% score that you put in bold, orange text next to the obvious winner: why thank you for giving us enough credibility to think that we're able to pick up a magazine and decipher those strange squiggles inside it.Stacey wrote:And last but not least, (cliché alert!) the notorious Supertest has Intel and AMD's new CPU going chip-to-chip through a battery of rigorous tests. Who's the winner? We leave that up to you.
Letters Page
This one truly takes the cake. Dear Ms Stacey Maree: has it ever occurred to you that the star letter be awarded to the person who displays the most creativity, or one who actually provides a useful contribution worth reading? Oh, no - instead, the star letter is awarded to some fool who thinks he might get lucky by spilling his supposed unfortunate fiscal situation to his favourite magazine... And as unbelievable as it may be, lucky he did get: you awarded him the star letter.Stacey - in reply to the winning letter: 'Lucky Fish' wrote:Out of sheer guilt for my good fortune I'm giving you our Star Letter prize for this month! Enjoy!
Of the increasingly dimishing letters page, there was one fellow who in fact did manage to bring across a few good points - it is the letter entitled "Criticism Corner". Constructive criticism never did any magazine any harm, and the writer of that letter undoubtedly deserved the star letter above any other letter that was printed.
Your humour is vastly abundant in negative quantities. If you try to be funny, please do so in a fashion that will pass at least a grin across someone's face, rather than a roll of the eyes at yet another unhumorous remark.Stacey - in reply to the letter: 'Orange Light' wrote:I have been wondering why red always seems to work on our cover so well. It's because you 'stop' and buy it. Ha ha!
[edit by neon - moved to PC Format section by request]