3D Mark 2005
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 4110
- Joined: 22 Mar 2005, 02:00
- Location: Stonehenge
- Contact:
@jPm: Thanks for the comment. I'm OC'ing the CPU on air to 3.2GHZ, 33% over the stock 2.4GHz. Can go 3.5GHz but not stable and only used for a quick benchie. Happy with a "mere" 3.2GHz as I've already corrupted one of my HDD's that was in a RAID array... bye bye data. Haven't got a single disk to bench with that I don't mind corrupting.
Best Suppi is 14.734. Link
/*Edit: Above Suppi score was @ 3.5GHz.
@I34z1k: No, your score is great. Nice little CPU that E6300. And the 8800GTS is superior of course.
/*Edit: Soz, I see your CPU is a E6400 I34z1k. And you've got the 7900GTX. I was v happy with my 7900GTX but my upgrade to 7950GX2 cost a couple hundred bucks, so I went for it.
Best Suppi is 14.734. Link
/*Edit: Above Suppi score was @ 3.5GHz.
@I34z1k: No, your score is great. Nice little CPU that E6300. And the 8800GTS is superior of course.
/*Edit: Soz, I see your CPU is a E6400 I34z1k. And you've got the 7900GTX. I was v happy with my 7900GTX but my upgrade to 7950GX2 cost a couple hundred bucks, so I went for it.
Last edited by Razer on 18 Jan 2007, 12:02, edited 5 times in total.
Umm... I have a e6400 and a 7900gtx Check my sig. The " Look "
At low res 7900 gts > 7950gx2, and I have an lcd, so I stayed with mine. Wait to see it on water
At low res 7900 gts > 7950gx2, and I have an lcd, so I stayed with mine. Wait to see it on water
Last edited by I34z1k on 17 Jan 2007, 15:59, edited 1 time in total.
@I34z1k: Soz, I edited my post when I went back and saw your your score post. I don't see your specs in your sig.
2X 7900GTX SLI on an X2-4800+ gets 8,489. in 3dmark06. I get 8,546 <<edited>>
I also have an LCD (Dell 19") and play at 1280x1024. But I'll now bump up AA and AF where no 7900GTX can go.
@W1K: Hehe, funny how some P5W DH's hit a wall and others don't. I know jasonhk and CD did way better but I ran the same settings as Jason and no dice. /*Edit: I edited my post above with the Suppi score. Was at 3.5GHz.
2X 7900GTX SLI on an X2-4800+ gets 8,489. in 3dmark06. I get 8,546 <<edited>>
I also have an LCD (Dell 19") and play at 1280x1024. But I'll now bump up AA and AF where no 7900GTX can go.
@W1K: Hehe, funny how some P5W DH's hit a wall and others don't. I know jasonhk and CD did way better but I ran the same settings as Jason and no dice. /*Edit: I edited my post above with the Suppi score. Was at 3.5GHz.
Last edited by Razer on 17 Jan 2007, 16:23, edited 2 times in total.
That's the Difference You will beable to Run your games at much higher resolutions with aa and af on max.
I'm running my 7900gs overclocked on my 19inch widescreen (1440x900) and it runs perfect, but I can't but AA and AF on certain games, I imagine that 7950x2 wud run that resolution perfectly.
BTW has anybody Run Tomb Raider Legend On Next generation? and I mean Smooth Frames
I'm running my 7900gs overclocked on my 19inch widescreen (1440x900) and it runs perfect, but I can't but AA and AF on certain games, I imagine that 7950x2 wud run that resolution perfectly.
BTW has anybody Run Tomb Raider Legend On Next generation? and I mean Smooth Frames
Another thing I would Like to know is what is the differnce btwn the E6300,e6400 and e6600 cpus, they seem to be similar except for clock speeds and upped cache(e6600)
To me all intel has done is Increase the Multiplyer by 1 each time
Is it possible with software to increase the cpU multiplyer? therefore I would have to increase the FSB and RaM as much
To me all intel has done is Increase the Multiplyer by 1 each time
Is it possible with software to increase the cpU multiplyer? therefore I would have to increase the FSB and RaM as much
Perhaps a Mod can move these off-topics to a new thread?
@jPm: I ran Tomb Raider Legend on Next Gen just fine with my OC'd XFX 7900GT 256MB @ 576/783. It was smooth but I can't quote the FPS I was getting off-hand
The primary difference between the CPU's you listed is the following:
#1 Multiplier
#2 Stock clock speed
#3 L2 cache - the E6600 has 2x2MB L2 cache.
The best software for OC'ing is ClockGen. I think you can only change your multi in the BIOS.
@jPm: I ran Tomb Raider Legend on Next Gen just fine with my OC'd XFX 7900GT 256MB @ 576/783. It was smooth but I can't quote the FPS I was getting off-hand
The primary difference between the CPU's you listed is the following:
#1 Multiplier
#2 Stock clock speed
#3 L2 cache - the E6600 has 2x2MB L2 cache.
The best software for OC'ing is ClockGen. I think you can only change your multi in the BIOS.