Super Pi Scores, Post yours here.

Oj · Post by Oj » 27 Dec 2005, 16:50

4min54. My expression was priceless...

Basipooned! · Post by **Basipooned!** » 27 Dec 2005, 16:51

ElDiablo wrote:wow, I see AMD and nVidia owns all 3D benchmarks.... nice

An Intel Machine (p4 4000Mhz) owns the non-Sli 3dmark 2003 benchie.

Farquaon · Post by **Farquaon** » 28 Dec 2005, 09:06

1M = 43 sec

AMD64 3500+ stock

Oj · Post by Oj » 30 Dec 2005, 11:32

How bout posting 32M scores?

Jasonhk · Post by **Jasonhk** » 30 Dec 2005, 17:45

Hehe...

Well RRA and us got a 22 Second one at rAge

RRA's FX57 our Dry Ice Tube

Also watch out for our LN2 Dothan Super Pi's will post up a thread here if there is anything to brag about

Basipooned! · Post by **Basipooned!** » 30 Dec 2005, 18:33

Y does it say Athlon(tm) FX-25 in the specification box of the above cpu-z screeny Even tho it sez FX-57 in the Name box

Oj · Post by Oj » 31 Dec 2005, 11:09

Wow, yours is accurate. Mine is only accurate to the nearest second.

Basipooned! · Post by **Basipooned!** » 31 Dec 2005, 12:41

Download Super Pi_Mod to get milliseconds.

Nic64 · Post by **Nic64** » 31 Dec 2005, 14:46

Only got 38.750 @ 2.526ghz!

Jasonhk · Post by **Jasonhk** » 31 Dec 2005, 18:26

The_Vice wrote:Y does it say Athlon(tm) FX-25 in the specification box of the above cpu-z screeny Even tho it sez FX-57 in the Name box

It's a DFI Bios Bug problem

Nic64 wrote:Only got 38.750 @ 2.526ghz!

That's pretty bad @ 2670Mhz i got 30 Seconds with my MSI K8N NEO2 some time ago.. Must be your RAM or something..

Oj wrote:Wow, yours is accurate. Mine is only accurate to the nearest second.

Yea as the other guy mentioned download SuperPI - Millisecond mod version

from : http://www.sa3doc.co.za/modules.php?nam ... load&cid=2

Basipooned! · Post by **Basipooned!** » 31 Dec 2005, 18:33

Nic64 wrote:Only got 38.750 @ 2.526ghz!

I got 37 Seconds with my p4 at 3.36 Ghz, 1:1 Ram at timings of 2.5-3-3-6
I got 39 Seconds with my p4 aat 3.63 Ghz I had to use a 5:4 ram divider so thats y it was slower..

Oj · Post by Oj » 02 Jan 2006, 14:11

...RAM divider? How does that work?

Lord_XST · Post by **Lord_XST** » 03 Jan 2006, 14:49

35.922 seconds, cant maintain that overclock, gets too warm here

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v213/ ... ted/35.jpg

Basipooned! · Post by **Basipooned!** » 03 Jan 2006, 14:57

Oj wrote:...RAM divider? How does that work?

This allows ur memory to run slower than ur FSB.. Its useful if ur ram is crappy and craps out if u push it too far..

The divider will allow you to pump the FSB without pushing the ram to far..
The drawback is that the divider wastes clock cycles and this can give a perfomance hit in bandwidth intensive apps which can in actuall fact counter the positive effect of the cpu o/c which was wat happened to me..

Lord_XST · Post by **Lord_XST** » 03 Jan 2006, 15:03

the vice, the performance drop only happens with P4's and AXP's. with a64's, there is no performance drop.

iirc, its to do with the onbaord memory controller.

Lord_XST · Post by **Lord_XST** » 03 Jan 2006, 15:14

btw, here is a different way of looknig at it. dunno if posted before, cbf looking, but look at this score:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v213/ ... enshot.png

shaved 6 seconds of my time by using linux :p

Sojourn · Post by **Sojourn** » 03 Jan 2006, 16:02

Lord_XST wrote:btw, here is a different way of looknig at it. dunno if posted before, cbf looking, but look at this score:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v213/ ... enshot.png

shaved 6 seconds of my time by using linux :p

Isn't there an OS category ? Like XP scores vs other XP scores and Linux scores vs Linux people... ?!?

s

Sojourn · Post by **Sojourn** » 03 Jan 2006, 16:04

Whats the current Pi record and held by what hardware?

s

Lord_XST · Post by **Lord_XST** » 03 Jan 2006, 16:15

S, would have to be close to this:

http://www.users.on.net/~zebra/itanium2 ... r_pi_2.jpg

taken from: http://www.atomicmpc.com.au/forums.asp?s=2&c=6&t=8599
(An australian forum i frequent)

edit: no idea about the seperate OS, didnt see anything

AlphA · Post by **AlphA** » 15 Mar 2006, 17:49

Lord_XST wrote:btw, here is a different way of looknig at it. dunno if posted before, cbf looking, but look at this score:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v213/ ... enshot.png

shaved 6 seconds of my time by using linux :p

Cool - didn't know there's a Linux version. Where did you get it from?

DAE_JA_VOO · Post by **DAE_JA_VOO** » 15 Mar 2006, 17:54

A few days ago i scored somewhere in the 32s, but i don't have a screenie. It was somewhere around 32.700 or so, with my X2 4400+ at 2.77Ghz, RAM hardly tweaked though...

AlphA · Post by **AlphA** » 15 Mar 2006, 18:05

Never mind.......found it, downloaded and ran the script. Seems like my scores improved by 10 seconds under Linux! (37 down to 27)

This cant be right.

DAE_JA_VOO · Post by **DAE_JA_VOO** » 15 Mar 2006, 18:20

Yeah, that can't be right...

Flytek · Post by **Flytek** » 15 Mar 2006, 19:26

it absolutely can be right.
you can't believe windoews could waste 25% of the performance through sloppy coding and bloatware?
believe it - they certainly can.

linux is waaaaaaaayyyyyy faster always

AlphA · Post by **AlphA** » 15 Mar 2006, 20:29

Flytek wrote:it absolutely can be right.
you can't believe windoews could waste 25% of the performance through sloppy coding and bloatware?
believe it - they certainly can.

linux is waaaaaaaayyyyyy faster always

You raise a very good point. I didn't think of that. The only inefficient thing about Linux at the momemt is the GUI, which, in my opinion, is not on par with Windows. The actual OS though is MUCH more efficient (and does a lot more), and this what counts in this test.

I could'nt agree more with Flytek.