3D Mark 2005
Garret wrote:Howzit,
is a 4016 any good for a 6800 Ultra card.
Not sure if I should be dissapointed or not.
Cheers
edit : I saw that card in SLI got 7229
edit : sorry - I am also running at stock speeds of 400 / 1100
I don't know dude, Ive been getting between 3600 and 3900 with a X800 Pro, and my system specs are lower than yours.
P4 2.8 HT
875P Neo mobo
2 x 512 DDR 400 Dual channel
X800 Pro Msi
Core 500 Mem 480
Ati Tool Overclock utility
Nah, GT is faster in most places, but not by too big a margin. Plus currently the 6800s have some quality problems.
This is always going to happen: you buy a card because it is currently the best, and the next month something comes out that is better for same price)
Or the card you bought is R1000 less
This is always going to happen: you buy a card because it is currently the best, and the next month something comes out that is better for same price)
Or the card you bought is R1000 less
Yeh, but its never really a good time to buy, cause new chips have problems, and the old chips are dated, so what do you do? Bit the bullet and take what you can get at the time for the best value for money.
Whats great about the GT's is that they overclcok to Ultra speeds but you're paying that much less.
Whats great about the GT's is that they overclcok to Ultra speeds but you're paying that much less.
Just get a GT it is cheaper and better.Disruptor wrote:What do you guys think of this X800
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 871
- Joined: 20 Feb 2003, 02:00
- Location: Amanzimtoti
You scored that on a 9700 Vanilla. OMG, thats good for a stock speeds. I must admit that I was running the 4.9 CAT (Not the MCentre) on default settings. I didn't change it to performance settings, will let you know what the results are.gorak wrote:squatting........ i was running the 4.9 mediacentre drivers set to performance... otherwise cpu and vga was NOT clocked. nforce2 ultra400 mobo.......powercolor raddy 9700........
BTW
Specs:
2500+ Barton
512MB Transcend
Gigabyte 9700 PRO
Abit NF7-S v2
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 871
- Joined: 20 Feb 2003, 02:00
- Location: Amanzimtoti
SM2 is not even a standard yet and you guys are worring about SM3, it going to be quite a while before SM3 is a standard in games. Please don't base you buy purely on ShaderModel, rather look for overall performance. Myself was a hardcore ATI fan but I must admit that the 6800 series NVidia card are great performers.Disruptor wrote:I'll keep that in mindHdB wrote:ATM I would stick to nvidia, at least until ATI have shader model 3.0.
It may not make much difference in speed, but when it starts getting supported
I'm just curious to see what going to happen in the PCIe market, will ATI gain some much needed groung back or will NVidia extent their leed further.
The only sad point about PCIe is that NVidia annouched that their new NFORCE4 chipset will not have Soundstorm, this is a big no-no from their side.
Can read some more about it on TheInquirer.
-
- I Bribed Ron With Foundry And All I Got Was This Lousy Title
- Posts: 9387
- Joined: 09 Aug 2002, 02:00
- Location: Locked Down
- Contact:
I would hate to see what scores my PC would get.
Want to support my creative work? Drop me a like and subscribe below. It will be greatly appreciated!
Clarke Media - YouTube Channel
Clarke Media - Facebook
Clarke Media - YouTube Channel
Clarke Media - Facebook