Rest of articleMyBroadband wrote:Opera Mini version 5 is now available for live public beta testing. The new version of the mobile OS offers compatibility with a number of new smart phones, which can take advantage of the new feature set offered.
Does it save your bookmarks?DAE_JA_VOO wrote:Just installed it about a half an hour ago. So far, it looks amazing. I'm a huge fan of Opera's mobile browser, and this is definitely no exception
Art Williams wrote:I'm not telling you it is going to be easy, I'm telling you it's going to be worth it.
Have you tried disabling inline edit? It irritated the hell out of me on my phone as I wasn't able to change the text mode to numbers only.DAE_JA_VOO wrote:So, I LOVE the browser, but I freaking HATE the keyboard I'm forced to use
I did that. Inline edit doesn't support predictive text.WiK1d wrote:Have you tried disabling inline edit? It irritated the hell out of me on my phone as I wasn't able to change the text mode to numbers only.DAE_JA_VOO wrote:So, I LOVE the browser, but I freaking HATE the keyboard I'm forced to use
Art Williams wrote:I'm not telling you it is going to be easy, I'm telling you it's going to be worth it.
I JUST figured that out 2 minutes ago before I came into this thread actually!! Hahahaha!! I was like... "okay wait, inline edit disables my native KB and forces me to use this crappy one... so what if I.. BAM!" Hahahha. So now all is good. Using my own native keyboard just fineWiK1d wrote:Have you tried disabling inline edit? It irritated the hell out of me on my phone as I wasn't able to change the text mode to numbers only.DAE_JA_VOO wrote:So, I LOVE the browser, but I freaking HATE the keyboard I'm forced to use
Will be interesting to see if it loads popups now in a separate tab instead of interfering with whatever page I'm trying to get to.I know! It's freaking awesome!Monty wrote:They introduced tabs! Yay!
Or just select the tab and hold down the middle muttonXiphan wrote:Oh, and to edit the Speed Dial buttons select one and press 1 on your keypad.
Art Williams wrote:I'm not telling you it is going to be easy, I'm telling you it's going to be worth it.
This has gotta be your crowning moment of stupidity as your post links back to the first page of this thread, so what exactly is your problem since this isn't a new thread.DAE_JA_VOO wrote:People don't use the search function anymore before starting new threads
Already posted, more than a week ago, here.
I find it slightly ironic that YOU you have the nerve to call ME stupid, when it was YOU who started a thread, which was merged with this one (which is the thread that I made that post in, BEFORE they were merged), yet , when you seem to be oblivious to the fact that YOU started a thread.Xiphan wrote:This has gotta be your crowning moment of stupidity as your post links back to the first page of this thread, so what exactly is your problem since this isn't a new thread.
So he quoted me, copied it, created a new thread showing how he found it as well as commenting on my tabs post... That seems like a lot of effort to create a new thread when he would have had to have read this one first...DAE_JA_VOO wrote:It blows my mind that YOU you have the audacity to call ME stupid, when it was YOU who started a thread, which was merged with this one (which is the thread that I made that post in, BEFORE they were merged), yet , when you seem to be oblivious to the fact that YOU started a thread.Xiphan wrote:This has gotta be your crowning moment of stupidity as your post links back to the first page of this thread, so what exactly is your problem since this isn't a new thread.
Blows my mind.
In case you've missed all of this. YOU started a thread, my post linked to THIS thread. YOUR thread was then MERGED with this one, which is why my link points to the first page of this thread. Your original thread no longer exists.
Art Williams wrote:I'm not telling you it is going to be easy, I'm telling you it's going to be worth it.
Greatest apologies Lol no worries man, we've all had our fair share of blonde moments.DAE_JA_VOO wrote:Oh my gosh. I was totally wrong. I must have missed the fact that his post was first on the SECOND page
Xiphan, totally my bad
Man, that pretty much DEFINED fail
Mine involves me getting banned after performing a search and not knowing which thread to post in, so I went for a hat-trick and posted in all three! 
And speaking of Ron, as he once commented if there was a way to bash a forum post this one would definitely be worth a bash or at least a candidacy for the Epic fail thread! Simple. I saw "Opera Mini 5 in beta testing" as the title. Now, after THIS very thread was created, another one was created by one of the PCF guys. So when I came on to the forum and saw THIS thread, I somehow thought it was ANOTHER repost, and when I went in, your post (the first post on page 2) looked like a First post, because it had a pic in and a bunch of text about the browser. I also missed the page numbers, so I thought it was page one, and because I knew that Ron's thread (this one) was RON'S, your post could only be post #1 in a new threadXiphan wrote:What I'd like to know is how you stumbled upon my post, and possibly saw the title of the thread as well, and was led to believe that I'd created another thread with the same title as Ron's thread?
