3D Mark 2006

WAJeff · Post by **WAJeff** » 27 Aug 2008, 08:42

FIrst time doing a proper benchie, so excuse the no0bness...
Heres a better res

WAJeff · Post by **WAJeff** » 03 Sep 2008, 14:07

Getting a XFX 8800GTS 320MB XXX Edition, which Ima SLI
Hoping its at the PO today, or tomorrow... shots to Fire for that

Got my CPU Cooler delivered today too, so I'll be doing some OCing and see how far it gets me. Will post up some benchies soon

IcePick88 · Post by **IcePick88** » 10 Oct 2008, 15:18

Hi Guys,

I score 10920 in 3DMark06. Is this good, average or bad for my rig?

Specs in sig.

Shot!

Edit: Everything is running stock speeds. Except for the GFX card that is factory clocked.

Frozenfireside · Post by **Frozenfireside** » 17 Oct 2008, 17:58

http://s122.photobucket.com/albums/o269 ... =11575.png

11575

I improved by clocking my RAM from 5-5-5-15 and unsynchronised to 4-4-4-12 synchronised.

Edit: I increased my FSB to 425 while keeping new timings.

GuntherHanne · Post by **GuntherHanne** » 15 Nov 2008, 23:16

My new upgraded rig's scores:

My previous rig's scores:

R3D · Post by **R3D** » 01 Dec 2008, 14:21

http://i319.photobucket.com/albums/mm45 ... 616398.png

at last i bettered my SLI score with a single card

Oj · Post by Oj » 31 Dec 2008, 11:38

28,215

Firestrm_ZA · Post by **Firestrm_ZA** » 02 Jan 2009, 15:25

just benched my new GTX260 at stock.

b3ast · Post by **b3ast** » 28 Jan 2009, 07:42

I just benched my 9600gt, stock everything, quite suprised at the score to be honest was expecting low 8000's

Molean · Post by **Molean** » 03 Feb 2009, 07:39

Benched my GTX295 last night.

Stock:

CPU @ 3.6Ghz:

This is one powerful card

Going to OC a bit more tonite and see what I get.
I used 181.22 Drivers and the card was at stock clocks.

UrBaN · Post by **UrBaN** » 06 Feb 2009, 01:44

Well I got 11653 last night in Windows 7

E4500 @ 3.2GHz
Force3D 4850 512mb
4GB Super Talent DDR3-1333
Asus Maximus Extreme

Catalyst won't OC my GFX under Windows 7 for some reason

Molean · Post by **Molean** » 06 Feb 2009, 07:55

Urban , How is windows 7 running for you? Thinking of installing the 64bit version tonite....

UrBaN · Post by **UrBaN** » 06 Feb 2009, 10:50

I'm currently using the 64-bit version and I have to say, it's a dream.

Only thing wrong is it doesn't support my sound card, but I bought it second hand from Noah when he was loading the ark, so that's understandable.

Otherwise it's quick and sexy

I need to bench XP to compare, but I doubt it will be any faster.

I get a system rating of 2.9

My GFX is 7.9, CPU 5.9, RAM 5.8 and HDD 2.9

Think it's dead or dying, my PC seems sluggish when doing HDD related activities.

Go for 7 dude, it rocks.

Prime · Post by **Prime** » 06 Feb 2009, 12:29

UrBaN wrote:I'm currently using the 64-bit version and I have to say, it's a dream.

Only thing wrong is it doesn't support my sound card, but I bought it second hand from Noah when he was loading the ark, so that's understandable.

Otherwise it's quick and sexy

I need to bench XP to compare, but I doubt it will be any faster.

I get a system rating of 2.9 My GFX is 7.9, CPU 5.9, RAM 5.8 and HDD 2.9

Think it's dead or dying, my PC seems sluggish when doing HDD related activities.

Go for 7 dude, it rocks.

small disk cache or sata 1 maybe? wierd, that old IBM 80 MB drive i was playing with last night, boots fine and doesn't slow my PC down, doesn't even drop my rating.

UrBaN · Post by **UrBaN** » 09 Feb 2009, 10:30

Molean · Post by **Molean** » 09 Feb 2009, 12:13

@ Urban - Only a 500 point increase on an extra 700Mhz OC?

UrBaN · Post by **UrBaN** » 09 Feb 2009, 12:28

Molean wrote:@ Urban - Only a 500 point increase on an extra 700Mhz OC?

Hey? What extra 700MHz OC dude?

All that changed is I changed the GFX Core from 625 to 650MHz.

GPU-Z doesn't show it though, it is only showing the 2D clocks, which I didn't change.

EDIT: Oh, and I got the DDR3 running at 1420 instead of 1280.

Dude, why is your sig so wide? Can't you push the enter key?

/troll

Molean · Post by **Molean** » 09 Feb 2009, 13:15

UrBaN wrote:
Molean wrote:@ Urban - Only a 500 point increase on an extra 700Mhz OC?
Hey? What extra 700MHz OC dude?

All that changed is I changed the GFX Core from 625 to 650MHz.

GPU-Z doesn't show it though, it is only showing the 2D clocks, which I didn't change.

EDIT: Oh, and I got the DDR3 running at 1420 instead of 1280.

Dude, why is your sig so wide? Can't you push the enter key?

/troll

Ah, look closely at your second Screenshot, Under System on 3dmark, the CPU stats; it says your CPU is running at 3905Mhz. So I assumed that from your previous Screenshot where you were running at 3.2Ghz, that you went up a furthur 700Mhz. See the method to my madnesS....lol. Now I understand the small jump in your Benchmark.

It's not my sig, it's Oj's huge screenshot.....lol....enter key? Whats that

UrBaN · Post by **UrBaN** » 09 Feb 2009, 13:16

Molean wrote:
UrBaN wrote:
Molean wrote:@ Urban - Only a 500 point increase on an extra 700Mhz OC?
Hey? What extra 700MHz OC dude?

All that changed is I changed the GFX Core from 625 to 650MHz.

GPU-Z doesn't show it though, it is only showing the 2D clocks, which I didn't change.

EDIT: Oh, and I got the DDR3 running at 1420 instead of 1280.

Dude, why is your sig so wide? Can't you push the enter key?

/troll
Ah, look closely at your second Screenshot, Under System on 3dmark, the CPU stats; it says your CPU is running at 3905Mhz. So I assumed that from your previous Screenshot where you were running at 3.2Ghz, that you went up a furthur 700Mhz. See the method to my madnesS....lol. Now I understand the small jump in your Benchmark.

It's not my sig, it's Oj's huge screenshot.....lol....enter key? Whats that

If I had my 2.2GHz CPU running at 3.9GHz I'd be more awesome than He-Man.

Nah, for some reason Windows detects it as the wrong speed, not sure why. May have something to do with the FSB Strap.

Still, I want 12500

HELP!

Molean · Post by **Molean** » 09 Feb 2009, 13:21

[/quote]
If I had my 2.2GHz CPU running at 3.9GHz I'd be more awesome than He-Man.

Nah, for some reason Windows detects it as the wrong speed, not sure why. May have something to do with the FSB Strap.

Still, I want 12500

HELP![/quote]

Hahaha, thats what I thought when I saw the 2.2 to 3.9 jump

Hmm push the card a bit more? Try for another 100Mhz on your CPU....might get you there.

UrBaN · Post by **UrBaN** » 09 Feb 2009, 21:29

Molean wrote:

If I had my 2.2GHz CPU running at 3.9GHz I'd be more awesome than He-Man.

Nah, for some reason Windows detects it as the wrong speed, not sure why. May have something to do with the FSB Strap.

Still, I want 12500

HELP![/quote]

Hahaha, thats what I thought when I saw the 2.2 to 3.9 jump

Hmm push the card a bit more? Try for another 100Mhz on your CPU....might get you there.

[/quote]
I tries but it's a stubborn bastid!

rautie · Post by **rautie** » 10 Feb 2009, 14:56

Hey, i'm quite impressed with my rig, looking at your results here. when i push my system, i get my cpu at 3.4ghz, memory at 833 (4.3.3.8 latency) and gfx cards at 660/1500/2000. my best 3d mark score at these settings is 18 102. thats in win xp though.
if you look at the gtx 295 post, i beat that! yes,yes, i know that was just a first run and everything is stock, so don't attack me! but i'm just feeling a glow of pride for my pc, and she is a 2 year old lady!

UrBaN · Post by **UrBaN** » 10 Feb 2009, 15:03

Congratulations, that's a really good score

be sure to post screenies of your score CPU-Z shots

Molean · Post by **Molean** » 11 Feb 2009, 08:03

rautie wrote:Hey, i'm quite impressed with my rig, looking at your results here. when i push my system, i get my cpu at 3.4ghz, memory at 833 (4.3.3.8 latency) and gfx cards at 660/1500/2000. my best 3d mark score at these settings is 18 102. thats in win xp though.
if you look at the gtx 295 post, i beat that! yes,yes, i know that was just a first run and everything is stock, so don't attack me! but i'm just feeling a glow of pride for my pc, and she is a 2 year old lady!

Nice. Buuuut, and I'm not attacking you, one of the main reasons for your score apart from the SLI is your Quad CPU. In 3Dmark06 your CPU will get double compared to mine. If I had a Quad running at 3ghz or more I would get 20K easily

Molean · Post by **Molean** » 11 Feb 2009, 12:17

GFX Oced, CPU Stock:

GFX Oced, CPU @ 3.6Ghz:

Need to work on my Ocing a bit. Was hoping for a bigger jump with just the GFX OC. But it does go up nicely when you OC the CPU.

PCFormat Forum Archive

3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006