3D Mark 2006

Vampyre_2099 · Post by **Vampyre_2099** » 10 Jul 2008, 22:46

StarBound, I've got my 4850 running @ 700/1050 perfectly with no problems, I am skeptical of this other ATI program that lets you overclock more than CCC lets you... I'll rather wait for a new Rivatuner ver

Post by **Stuart** » 19 Jul 2008, 21:14

Everything at stock.

Dust · Post by **Dust** » 20 Jul 2008, 07:17

Very nice score Schase. I see you have your 1200's in. Great.

Post by **Stuart** » 20 Jul 2008, 08:24

Actually still waiting for the RMA on one set, but I ran out of space in my sig to say "on the way," so ...

Dust · Post by **Dust** » 20 Jul 2008, 08:29

Ah. Lol.

Are the 1066's oc'ed to 1200 too then? Ore are the 1200's running a bit slower for now?

Post by **Stuart** » 20 Jul 2008, 10:27

Everything at stock for that 3D Mark06 run, so RAM running at 1066.

WAJeff · Post by **WAJeff** » 20 Jul 2008, 10:42

Im gonna post a benchie when I get home... and install 3DMark06
Not gonna be the best, coz Im still running with a P4... so I'll post when I get my E6750

Dust · Post by **Dust** » 20 Jul 2008, 11:07

Well done Schase.

Or should I only say that when you start OC'ing? Lol.

Hex_Rated · Post by **Hex_Rated** » 31 Jul 2008, 23:05

Single 8800GT
Q9450

Post by **Stuart** » 31 Jul 2008, 23:09

What you overclocked to, Hex?

R3D · Post by **R3D** » 31 Jul 2008, 23:24

Whats your score hex i cant load that image

Hex_Rated · Post by **Hex_Rated** » 31 Jul 2008, 23:31

3.6Ghz stable so far.

At 3.36Ghz I had over 15,000 as well. I think it's probably because when I installed windows, I just copied missing dx9 dll system files over to the system32 folder instead of installing 3dm06 properly. I'm wondering if a clean format and proper install will up my score a bit.

What clocks are you getting so far?

@ R3D: 15027

R3D · Post by **R3D** » 31 Jul 2008, 23:35

http://s319.photobucket.com/albums/mm45 ... 614991.jpg

R3D · Post by **R3D** » 01 Aug 2008, 00:15

Post by **Stuart** » 01 Aug 2008, 09:21

Hex_Rated wrote:What clocks are you getting so far?

I only got to 3.4 stable, but that was before I formatted. I have been trying to sort out a different issue that I am having, so I haven't tried overclocking since the format.

Edit: I mean I was overclocking on an existing installation of Windows, even though I had upgraded CPU, motherboard, GFX, RAM ... So a clean install might actually help in my case.

I34z1k · Post by **I34z1k** » 01 Aug 2008, 11:24

R3d, something seems wrong... A quad with 2x 88gt's?

I got more with a dual @ 4ghz and a single 98gtx...

Post by **maxxis** » 01 Aug 2008, 11:42

Something is seriously wrong

I would hit 15k with a quad @ 3.5 and a single 8800GTX

pesospesos · Post by **pesospesos** » 05 Aug 2008, 16:43

12822 @ stock

Guess if I pushed to 4 ghz I would hit 14k. Happy enough tho.

I34z1k · Post by **I34z1k** » 05 Aug 2008, 16:59

Seems whack...

Maybe I just bench well?

With the sane setup @ 4ghz I got 16300

Molean · Post by **Molean** » 09 Aug 2008, 14:36

11462 at stock.
Specs in sig

FTB_Screamer · Post by **FTB_Screamer** » 21 Aug 2008, 09:47

CPU-Z seemed to conflict with HardwareMonitor, so i couldn't show it.

R3D · Post by **R3D** » 22 Aug 2008, 09:51

FTB very nice man

but how does the 260GTX perform in games?

FTB_Screamer · Post by **FTB_Screamer** » 22 Aug 2008, 13:33

R3D wrote:FTB very nice man but how does the 260GTX perform in games?

Thanks!

I've got the factory oc'ed MSI model, which is similar to this Zotac one, if you want to see some benches. I mainly got it so that I can run my games at 1680x1050 4xAA 16AF, and it's doing it with everything except Crysis, it runs but a 46 avg fps without aa is a hell of a lot better that 32 fps avg with AA.

R3D · Post by **R3D** » 22 Aug 2008, 13:58

Im seriously contemplating buying one of those seeing as it beats the hd4870 in most game benchmarks at my resolution.

Dust · Post by **Dust** » 27 Aug 2008, 07:08

I was like that score in Vista!! Then I noticed it's XP with a transformation pack.

Nice score though.

PCFormat Forum Archive

3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006

Re: 3D Mark 2006