Moon Landings: Real or Hoax?
Forum rules
Please read the discussion section rules before posting in here. By posting in this section, you acknowledge to have read and understood them, and agree to abide by them at all times.
Of course, the global forum rules apply here too.
NOTE: posts in this section are not counted towards your total.
Please read the discussion section rules before posting in here. By posting in this section, you acknowledge to have read and understood them, and agree to abide by them at all times.
Of course, the global forum rules apply here too.
NOTE: posts in this section are not counted towards your total.
Re: Did the Americans land on the moon?
Spam thread. mods ...
Asus Rampage Formula : E8400@4000 : 4GB Mushkin Frostbite @1066/5.5.5.15/TRD6
Sapphire 4870 Toxic 1GB: Coolermaster HAF : BlackIce360 Rad : Apogee GT : DTek-Customs Rez.
Sapphire 4870 Toxic 1GB: Coolermaster HAF : BlackIce360 Rad : Apogee GT : DTek-Customs Rez.
Re: Did the Americans land on the moon?
We all know everything on Wikipedia and in People Magazine is fact.capanno wrote:credible info... hahaha.
to ápeiro anima
Re: Did the Americans land on the moon?
because then you might understand how it became a "refuge", what effect drilling would actually have, the amount of area that would actually be drilled, and that provisions were set for future drilling.jamin_za wrote:Why?
It's a Wildlife refuge, FFS.
That means you leave it alone unless absolutely necessary.
Even minimally invasive drilling techniques will mess with the natural habitat. Plus pipelines, vehicles etc... Bye-bye pristine nature.
A primer:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arctic_Ref ... ontroversy
They haven't gone up in 8 years. In fact they have went down. They will not go up because of the war. While all you probably here about on the news is war spending the budget looks like this:jamin_za wrote:And it's also one that is going to affect you no matter who takes power.
Whether it's for welfare, or to support a longer stay in Iraq (and possibly a trip to Iran), your taxes will be going up.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/e ... tegory.png
Defense makes up the largest discretionary spending (always has) but it pails to what is spent on social programs. It won't be defense that makes ny taxes go up. It will be the continually climbing rates of spending on social programs.
SS, medicare, and welfare
$586.1 billion (+7.0%) - Social Security
$548.8 billion (+9.0%) - Defense[2]
$394.5 billion (+12.4%) - Medicare
$294.0 billion (+2.0%) - Unemployment and welfare
$276.4 billion (+2.9%) - Medicaid and other health related
$243.7 billion (+13.4%) - Interest on debt
$89.9 billion (+1.3%) - Education and training
$76.9 billion (+8.1%) - Transportation
$72.6 billion (+5.8%) - Veterans' benefits
$43.5 billion (+9.2%) - Administration of justice
$33.1 billion (+5.7%) - Natural resources and environment
$32.5 billion (+15.4%) - Foreign affairs
$27.0 billion (+3.7%) - Agriculture
$26.8 billion (+28.7%) - Community and regional development
$25.0 billion (+4.0%) - Science and technology
$23.5 billion (+0.8%) - Energy
$20.1 billion (+11.4%) - General government
SS being the biggest one because it will no longer be solvent in a few years. Payments will exceed receipts in 2017 or before. Dems will choose to fund it from the general fund or raise SS tax. Either way a tax increase to save a failing program that demographics no longer supports.
This is mostly an exaggeration stemming from the use of the reserve and extended tours of duty and retention. Fact is this is common in war. Problem is we haven't had one in awhile. My contract for example was 6 years active and 4 inactive. I was in for 6 years but if the government felt thay needed me they could have held me for four additional years or called me back within that time period. Military folks are aware of this. Does it suck? Kind of but you understand this when you sign up. Are there people bitching about it? Absolutely..........jamin_za wrote:Your military is desperately short on troops. They have have almost exhausted their supply of national guardsmen and reservists.
This is BS. Are the "gang members" in the military? Yes. There was when I was in and there was long before that. The difference is you get to see that on the news now.jamin_za wrote: They are now recruiting hardened criminals and gang members into their armed forces.
There is no chance of a draft now. If anything were to happen to cause a need for the draft it would not matter who is in office. That said if a draft was needed I wouldn't be trying to get out of it (although I think I'm to old now). You'll need to talk to someone else for that arguement to have any weight..........jamin_za wrote:At least with Obama there is less of a chance of you being drafted into military service.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 4754
- Joined: 06 Aug 2003, 02:00
- Processor: PHENOM II 945
- Motherboard: Asus M4A78
- Graphics card: HIS ICEQ 4850 1GB
- Memory: 4GB CORSAIR XMS II 1066
- Location: , location, location!
Re: Did the Americans land on the moon?
vs
very similar no?
crazy now officially has a face...
"Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist that black flag, and begin slitting throats."
- H. L. Mancken
- H. L. Mancken
- hamin_aus
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 18363
- Joined: 28 Aug 2003, 02:00
- Processor: Intel i7 3770K
- Motherboard: GA-Z77X-UP4 TH
- Graphics card: Galax GTX1080
- Memory: 32GB G.Skill Ripjaws
- Location: Where beer does flow and men chunder
- Contact:
Re: Did the Americans land on the moon?
Quoting off Wiki again...QBM wrote:$586.1 billion (+7.0%) - Social Security
$548.8 billion (+9.0%) - Defense[2]
$394.5 billion (+12.4%) - Medicare
$294.0 billion (+2.0%) - Unemployment and welfare
$276.4 billion (+2.9%) - Medicaid and other health related
$243.7 billion (+13.4%) - Interest on debt
$89.9 billion (+1.3%) - Education and training
$76.9 billion (+8.1%) - Transportation
$72.6 billion (+5.8%) - Veterans' benefits
$43.5 billion (+9.2%) - Administration of justice
$33.1 billion (+5.7%) - Natural resources and environment
$32.5 billion (+15.4%) - Foreign affairs
$27.0 billion (+3.7%) - Agriculture
$26.8 billion (+28.7%) - Community and regional development
$25.0 billion (+4.0%) - Science and technology
$23.5 billion (+0.8%) - Energy
$20.1 billion (+11.4%) - General government
That [2] means that the figure above is a point of contention and may be incorrect or requires validation. I'm not sure how believable it is, but I'll give it the benefit of the doubt.
Interest on debt will go up as the US continues to spend money it does not have to finance the war. Here in SA we are actually paying off our debt, not struggling to just keep ahead of the interest
How is it that the US spend 14% of it's budget on Medicare & Medicaid, but I hear so many horror stories about your health system?
Re: Did the Americans land on the moon?
You are welcome to check:jamin_za wrote:Quoting off Wiki again...
That [2] means that the figure above is a point of contention and may be incorrect or requires validation. I'm not sure how believable it is, but I'll give it the benefit of the doubt.
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/index.html
The cost of the war in the context of our national debt and intrest is negligable.jamin_za wrote:Interest on debt will go up as the US continues to spend money it does not have to finance the war.
Not sure what you have heard but when I go to the doctor I get the best care available. I also pay $200 a check for insurance. That money spent on medicare and medicaid is spent on "low income" and the elderly.jamin_za wrote:How is it that the US spend 14% of it's budget on Medicare & Medicaid, but I hear so many horror stories about your health system?
Is insurance expensive? Absolutely although there are high deductible plans available which are far more affordable.
What causes prices to be so high? Contrary to popular belief everyone who walks into the emergency room gets treated. Who pays for it? People who actually pay there bills, have insurance, and the government. This however is not enough to offset all the care "given" away. If you go to the local emergency room here you will find that 95% of the people there really shouldn't be there but they get seen. In addition to this we are spending tons of money to prolong the life of the elderly. The number of "elderly" is about to increase substantially with the retirement of the baby boomers adding to the cost. These baby boomers will also live substantially longer than previous generations. Again adding to the cost.
The current systems were not designed for this.
Here is a story about one of the local hospitals here that may shed some light:
http://www.emorywheel.com/detail.php?n=24144
I should also mention that the majority of "uninsured" are not poor.
Last edited by QBM on 08 Sep 2008, 19:28, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Did the Americans land on the moon?
The cure does work. Cured me three times already.QBM wrote:Contrary to popular belief in SA the "cure" doesn't work. You're right though I do have a daughter. She however is 9 so I think she is a bit too old in your country.Hex_Rated wrote:America:
0.000001% NASA
99.9% McDonalds
**** yeah!
Unfortunately the people that work at McDonalds somehow think they're as clever as the few NAZI scientists that helped them get to the moon.
But please come visit. I need to cure my AIDS and you seem like someone who would be able to help me out.
Mcdonalds? No. You really should research job sector percentages in the US but remaining in a blissful state of ignorance seems to be status quo around here..........They are however accepting applications over here. Maybe that could help lower your 26% unemployment rate. Also you could send the money back home. Starting out as the "fry guy" you would be making double the median income for a SA white male.
Listening to you folks making smartass comments about the US and then looking at the stats for SA just makes me LOL.
I'd move to the US, but the people are such arrogant idiots that I'd rather stay here and deal with my AIDS. Some of my US customers are quite nice people though, but they seem to be the exception rather than the norm. I write embedded firmware for lots of systems that are in use in the US. Some very mission critical stuff as well. Maybe they feel humbled that they have to outsource their most complex work out to a third world country in Africa. And it's not that we do it for cheap either, I can assure you that.
Keep that in mind next time you or your family are in hospital. Especially on a life support system.
DFI LanParty X48 LT-2TR
Intel Q9450 @ 3.2Ghz
Dell 24" 2408WFP | Phillips 37" 1080p
Sapphire HD4870 X2 2GB
4GB Corsair DDR-2 1066 | Thermalrite 120 Ultra Extreme | G9 Mouse | G15 Keyboard
Vista Ultimate x64
Intel Q9450 @ 3.2Ghz
Dell 24" 2408WFP | Phillips 37" 1080p
Sapphire HD4870 X2 2GB
4GB Corsair DDR-2 1066 | Thermalrite 120 Ultra Extreme | G9 Mouse | G15 Keyboard
Vista Ultimate x64
Re: Did the Americans land on the moon?
LOL.....your logic is great. FYI what you see as expensive is not for such firms you are servicing compared to what they would pay here. I can assure you there is nothing you provide that is not available here with the same or better level of quality just at an increased cost.....except maybe diamonds.Hex_Rated wrote:
I'd move to the US, but the people are such arrogant idiots that I'd rather stay here and deal with my AIDS. Some of my US customers are quite nice people though, but they seem to be the exception rather than the norm. I write embedded firmware for lots of systems that are in use in the US. Some very mission critical stuff as well. Maybe they feel humbled that they have to outsource their most complex work out to a third world country in Africa. And it's not that we do it for cheap either, I can assure you that.
Keep that in mind next time you or your family are in hospital. Especially on a life support system.
Re: Jamin and QBM's debate thread
You have no idea. What, you think because your country has a few people that know what they're doing that it automatically makes YOU better than everyone else? Because it doesn't. It makes THEM better. And they probably laugh all the way to the bank just like I do. In my field of expertise I'd have to take a pay cut at first to get a job in your country. Then maybe after a year or two I'd be back to where I am now.
But I wouldn't want to move there, I have the opportunity but no thanks. I know you're not typically representative of the people of your country, you admittedly do have more than half a brain and I know you just enjoy trolling.
And what do I consider expensive? 6 figures USD for a month's work was quite nice. I didn't see that type of money but that's what we charged just for my time. Certified at the contractor's expense so we aren't liable for any bugs. Passed first time.
And I don't have a PhD or anything, maybe some other time. America f*ck yeah!
But I wouldn't want to move there, I have the opportunity but no thanks. I know you're not typically representative of the people of your country, you admittedly do have more than half a brain and I know you just enjoy trolling.
And what do I consider expensive? 6 figures USD for a month's work was quite nice. I didn't see that type of money but that's what we charged just for my time. Certified at the contractor's expense so we aren't liable for any bugs. Passed first time.
And I don't have a PhD or anything, maybe some other time. America f*ck yeah!
DFI LanParty X48 LT-2TR
Intel Q9450 @ 3.2Ghz
Dell 24" 2408WFP | Phillips 37" 1080p
Sapphire HD4870 X2 2GB
4GB Corsair DDR-2 1066 | Thermalrite 120 Ultra Extreme | G9 Mouse | G15 Keyboard
Vista Ultimate x64
Intel Q9450 @ 3.2Ghz
Dell 24" 2408WFP | Phillips 37" 1080p
Sapphire HD4870 X2 2GB
4GB Corsair DDR-2 1066 | Thermalrite 120 Ultra Extreme | G9 Mouse | G15 Keyboard
Vista Ultimate x64
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 26022
- Joined: 13 May 2004, 02:00
- Location: Getting there...
- Contact:
Re: Did the Americans land on the moon?
Seems you got your way?Tribble wrote:Perhaps a topic change would prevent annoying posts from people like me who still want to talk about the moon.
jamin_za wrote: Yes - a lot of what I have heard about McCAin is hearsay, most of it from his opponents, but I am inclined to think some of it is true.
The man just does not strike me as a calpable leader. He is old and seems crotchety. He is likely to piss of the whole of East Asia sooner or later...
Plus when his mind evetually goes, who is going to be in charge? Sarah Palin.
Sarah Palin just rubs me the wrong way. She is a gifted orator, and a MILF, and I agree with a few of the things she supports, but...
MILF = She's attractive BUT scary connotations there?
So you support some of here policies but not all? Get in line.
If you EVER agree with ANYONE else on all the issues - and there are lots in politics - you are in need of a brain transplant. Which you've never appeared to be?
I agree McCain is a [insert favorite derogatory description here], but don't base that on Palin being his running mate. Maybe if he croaks before his term is over America would be better off?
MOOD - Thirsty
A surprising amount of modern pseudoscience is coming out of the environmental sector. Perhaps it should not be so surprising given that environmentalism is political rather than scientific.
Timothy Casey
A surprising amount of modern pseudoscience is coming out of the environmental sector. Perhaps it should not be so surprising given that environmentalism is political rather than scientific.
Timothy Casey
- Tribble
- Registered User
- Posts: 88465
- Joined: 08 Feb 2007, 02:00
- Processor: Intel Core i7-4770K CPU@3.50GHz
- Motherboard: ACPI x64-based PC
- Graphics card: GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- Memory: 16GB
- Location: Not here
- Contact:
Re: Did the Americans land on the moon?
Yes - it seems I did.doo_much wrote:Seems you got your way?Tribble wrote:Perhaps a topic change would prevent annoying posts from people like me who still want to talk about the moon.
A milf? Ah so those are the current standards of milfdom these days
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 26022
- Joined: 13 May 2004, 02:00
- Location: Getting there...
- Contact:
Re: Jamin and QBM's debate thread
wiktionary wrote:MILF has become a much-used descriptor on the Internet for pornography sites featuring MILFs: (Married) women (with grown children) mostly between the ages of 35 and 55.
MOOD - Thirsty
A surprising amount of modern pseudoscience is coming out of the environmental sector. Perhaps it should not be so surprising given that environmentalism is political rather than scientific.
Timothy Casey
A surprising amount of modern pseudoscience is coming out of the environmental sector. Perhaps it should not be so surprising given that environmentalism is political rather than scientific.
Timothy Casey
Re: Jamin and QBM's debate thread
yes maybe ....but the fact that you keep coming back speaks volumes about your own intellect or should i rather say lack of itEvery time I visit this forum people seem to be less in touch with reality ....and dare I say collectively dumber.
Asus Z68-V Pro/Gen3, i5-3570k, 16GB Kingston Hyperx DDR3-1600, Gigabyte Radeon HD6970 OC graphics card, Corsair H100 liquid cpu cooling, Lite-on Blu-ray burner, Western Digital Raptor X HDD, Gigabyte Sumo 5115 modded case, Samsung P2770 monitor
Re: Jamin and QBM's debate thread
lolnaughty wrote:yes maybe ....but the fact that you keep coming back speaks volumes about your own intellect or should i rather say lack of itEvery time I visit this forum people seem to be less in touch with reality ....and dare I say collectively dumber.
Re: Jamin and QBM's debate thread
He's banned from everywhere else, that's why he comes back. We as S Africans are too dumb to permaban his bottom. We should just give him AIDS instead.
DFI LanParty X48 LT-2TR
Intel Q9450 @ 3.2Ghz
Dell 24" 2408WFP | Phillips 37" 1080p
Sapphire HD4870 X2 2GB
4GB Corsair DDR-2 1066 | Thermalrite 120 Ultra Extreme | G9 Mouse | G15 Keyboard
Vista Ultimate x64
Intel Q9450 @ 3.2Ghz
Dell 24" 2408WFP | Phillips 37" 1080p
Sapphire HD4870 X2 2GB
4GB Corsair DDR-2 1066 | Thermalrite 120 Ultra Extreme | G9 Mouse | G15 Keyboard
Vista Ultimate x64
- hamin_aus
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 18363
- Joined: 28 Aug 2003, 02:00
- Processor: Intel i7 3770K
- Motherboard: GA-Z77X-UP4 TH
- Graphics card: Galax GTX1080
- Memory: 32GB G.Skill Ripjaws
- Location: Where beer does flow and men chunder
- Contact:
Re: Jamin and QBM's debate thread
Sarah Palin is slightly more attractive, but infinity less charming than Tina Fey.
Man, I have a thing for Tina Fey!
Man, I have a thing for Tina Fey!
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 26022
- Joined: 13 May 2004, 02:00
- Location: Getting there...
- Contact:
Re: Jamin and QBM's debate thread
we be hating 'cause jamin be baiting?jamin_za wrote:Sarah Palin is slightly more attractive, but infinity less charming than Tina Fey.
Man, I have a thing for Tina Fey!
MOOD - Thirsty
A surprising amount of modern pseudoscience is coming out of the environmental sector. Perhaps it should not be so surprising given that environmentalism is political rather than scientific.
Timothy Casey
A surprising amount of modern pseudoscience is coming out of the environmental sector. Perhaps it should not be so surprising given that environmentalism is political rather than scientific.
Timothy Casey
- Prime
- Registered User
- Posts: 27729
- Joined: 01 Mar 2004, 02:00
- Location: Getting into trouble
- Contact:
Re: Jamin and QBM's debate thread
Are you sure you don't want her daughter instead? She seems more availabledoo_much wrote:we be hating 'cause jamin be baiting?jamin_za wrote:Sarah Palin is slightly more attractive, but infinity less charming than Tina Fey.
Man, I have a thing for Tina Fey!
- hamin_aus
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 18363
- Joined: 28 Aug 2003, 02:00
- Processor: Intel i7 3770K
- Motherboard: GA-Z77X-UP4 TH
- Graphics card: Galax GTX1080
- Memory: 32GB G.Skill Ripjaws
- Location: Where beer does flow and men chunder
- Contact:
Re: Jamin and QBM's debate thread
QBM, I'm not convinced this is 100% accurate, but what are your thoughts.
I take it you are in the top 2 of those income categories...
I take it you are in the top 2 of those income categories...
Re: Jamin and QBM's debate thread
Valid necro time ...
Conspiracy Theorist Convinces Neil Armstrong Moon Landing Was Faked
Original PostDAE_JA_VOO wrote:Time for some debate/conspiracy goodness
Do you guys believe that the US did, in fact, land on the mood in 1969?
And sceptics out there? Anyone 100% that they did? Anyone 100% sure they didn't?
Aaaaaaaaand......
GO!
Conspiracy Theorist Convinces Neil Armstrong Moon Landing Was Faked
For those who start getting too excited, please notice the source.TheOnion.com wrote:LEBANON, OHIO—Apollo 11 mission commander and famed astronaut Neil Armstrong shocked reporters at a press conference Monday, announcing he had been convinced that his historic first step on the moon was part of an elaborate hoax orchestrated by the United States government.
According to Armstrong, he was forced to reconsider every single detail of the monumental journey after watching a few persuasive YouTube videos, and reading several blog posts on conspiracy theorist Ralph Coleman's website, OmissionControl.org.
"It only took a few hastily written paragraphs published by this passionate denier of mankind's so-called 'greatest technological achievement' for me to realize I had been living a lie, " said a visibly emotional Armstrong, addressing reporters at his home. "It has become painfully clear to me that on July 20, 1969, the Lunar Module under the control of my crew did not in fact travel 250,000 miles over eight days, touch down on the moon, and perform various experiments, ushering in a new era for humanity. Instead, the entire thing was filmed on a soundstage, most likely in New Mexico."
"This is the only logical interpretation of the numerous inconsistencies in the grainy, 40-year-old footage," Armstrong added.
Although Armstrong said he "could have sworn" he felt the effects of zero gravity while soaring out of the Earth's atmosphere and through space, he now believed his memory must be flawed. He also admitted feeling "ashamed" that he had failed to notice the rippling of the American flag he and Buzz Aldrin planted on the surface, blaming his lack of awareness on the bulkiness of the spacesuit and his excitement about traveling to the "moon."
"That rippling is not possible in the vacuum of space," Armstrong said. "It must have been the wind from an air-conditioning duct that I didn't recognize because you can't hear a damn thing inside those helmets."
"This is all just common sense, people," he added. "It's the moon. You can't land on the moon."
In a symbolic display of his newfound skepticism, Armstrong then grabbed a collection of moon rocks he had kept as souvenirs and dramatically dumped them into a trash can.
One of the main arguments posited on Coleman's website—that America could not, in 1969, have realistically possessed the technological capabilities needed to put a man on the moon—was reportedly one of the first things to cause the legendary astronaut a pang of doubt. Despite having spent thousands of hours training for the historic mission under the guidance of the world's top scientists, technicians, and pilots, Armstrong said he knew the conspiracy theories were true after learning that website author Coleman was "quite the engineering buff."
"Yes, at the time I thought those thousands of NASA employees were working round the clock for the same incredible goal, but if anyone would know what was really going on, it would be Ralph Coleman," Armstrong said of the 31-year-old part-time librarian's assistant. "He knows a lot more about faked moon landings than I ever could. He's been researching the subject on the Internet for years."
"Literally years," he added.
Addressing another inconsistency brought to light by OmissionControl, Armstrong explained he was probably so focused on piloting the lunar module that he failed to notice that one of the moon rocks visible in footage of the landing appears to have the letter 'C' stamped on it. An emotional Armstrong said that the only possible explanation for this detail was that the rock actually came from NASA's prop department.
"They forgot to turn it over," Armstrong said, removing his eyeglasses to wipe away tears. "Those lying bastards at NASA went through all the trouble to fake the moon landing, but they forgot to turn over one little prop rock. And now the whole damn thing's blowing up in their faces."
Although Armstrong initially questioned why the U.S. would attempt such an elaborate cover-up, he cited one overarching explanation provided by Coleman: that it was a ploy to defeat the Soviet Union and fulfill the Illuminati's plan to unify the world's banks and control the dissemination of information.
"Just ask Ralph Coleman," Armstrong said. "He'll answer any questions you have."
To conclude the press conference, Armstrong showed reporters footage of his first steps on the moon to demonstrate that the most daming evidence was "right under our noses." Speeding up the tape and replaying the graceful moonwalk several times in a row, Armstrong explained that the iconic images of humanity's triumphant dance with the cosmos was actually just a film of him walking backwards, slowed down, and played in reverse.
"What other explanation could there be?" Armstrong asked. "It's all right here. Everything is all right here if you'd just open your damn eyes and see!"
Added Armstrong, "I suppose it really was one small step for man, one giant lie for mankind."
-
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 10000
- Joined: 05 Feb 2004, 02:00
- Processor: Intel i5-4690K @ 4.5GHZ
- Motherboard: ASUS Maximus VII Formula
- Graphics card: ASUS GTX970 Strix
- Memory: 4 x 4GB Corsair Dominators
- Location: Messing with your Mind
- Contact:
Re: Jamin and QBM's debate thread
Indian Probe Takes Clear Photo of Apollo 15, Hopefully Smashing Conspiracy Theories Forever
Click images for bigger View
Just for those who actually think it was faked
NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter took photos of the Apollo landings last July. They were supposed to end all conspiracy theories, but there are still idiots who said they were false. Thankfully, the Indians took their own photo. Spot the tracks!
This image was one of the last photographs sent by Chandrayaan-1, the moon probe that stopped communicating with Earth last Saturday. It clearly shows the Apollo 15 rover tracks on the Moon surface.
So there you go: A third party confirms the landings. Happy now, you conspiracy retards? No? I don't care. Just stop writing stupid emails justifying your idiotic arguments trying to prove that Armstrong didn't walk on the moon (because he did, and he has the photo and the t-shirt to prove it).
Click images for bigger View
Just for those who actually think it was faked
Art Williams wrote:I'm not telling you it is going to be easy, I'm telling you it's going to be worth it.
- rustypup
- Registered User
- Posts: 8872
- Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 02:00
- Location: nullus pixius demonica
- Contact:
Re: Jamin and QBM's debate thread
<in before the SHOPPED!..>
i, too, could draw a red scrawl around an indistinct smudge and claim indisputable proof that yetis have been having illegal intercourse with the moon.... with the UN's consent!
<out before the SMACK..>
i, too, could draw a red scrawl around an indistinct smudge and claim indisputable proof that yetis have been having illegal intercourse with the moon.... with the UN's consent!
<out before the SMACK..>
Most people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so - Bertrand Russel
Re: Jamin and QBM's debate thread
Don't be daft ... everyone knows that Yetis only procreate where it snowsrustypup wrote:<in before the SHOPPED!..>
i, too, could draw a red scrawl around an indistinct smudge and claim indisputable proof that yetis have been having illegal intercourse with the moon.... with the UN's consent!
<out before the SMACK..>
- rustypup
- Registered User
- Posts: 8872
- Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 02:00
- Location: nullus pixius demonica
- Contact:
Re: Jamin and QBM's debate thread
that's what the UN wants you to think... sheeple...
Most people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so - Bertrand Russel
Re: Jamin and QBM's debate thread
Let's ask Ralph Coleman