Re: ATI... erm, AMD vs nVidia!
Posted: 26 May 2014, 15:57
9 290, feel the powa!
Also, I'm jelly
Also, I'm jelly
An archive of the South African PCFormat forums.
https://tuhinga.ron2k.za.net/pcformat/
If you're only getting one, then get the 290. There's really not much in it, but it is slightly better for gaming and it has double the VRAM.Iceblade wrote:I'm now stuck on this,
I have only owned NVIDIA cards,
but on price I can get a better RADEON card, or better according to benchmark and test scores.
They do run hotter on the test too.
So I could go for GFX770 or Radeon9290.
Found the following on the net:StarPhoenix wrote:@Iceblade:
Consider what else you might be using your computer for.
Are you wanting a new card to enjoy better gaming performance only, or is there other software [such as Blender, for example] that you use regularly that would benefit from nVidia CUDA acceleration?
If I had thought my graphics upgrade through properly, I would not have opted for a Radeon for just this reason.
Why quote that piece specifically (instead of, say, the meat of the article)?And with word on the street of an imminent injection of capital coming AMD’s way very soon, we should see the dedicated CPU and GPU groups take on a razor sharp focus and play a much more aggressive role in the PC industry’s perpetual game of chess.