Page 39 of 41
Posted: 18 Jan 2007, 10:41
by Hman
Some of the problems with TRL's next gen seems to be with the AA and depth of field settings. Switching AA off in the game, and specifying say 2x in your control panel helps a bit.
Posted: 18 Jan 2007, 11:16
by Gouhan
14,077 using E6700 @ 3.4GHz with Sapphire X1950XTX Toxic
Will see if I can do better, now as this was some time ago.
3DM05 reaches a cap of some sort when you get past the 22K mark. Like you could make 19K with a single 8800GTS add a second one and only get 24K :/
Change to GTX and only get 25K[/img]
Posted: 29 Jan 2007, 08:14
by Hman
I'm up to 10654, GFX at 625 / 1600, CPU at 2.6Ghz, MEM at 432Mhz 2-3-2-1 timings. Now if only I can get my GFX to run 3dMark at 670 / 1600.
Posted: 07 Mar 2007, 13:04
by Molean
Benched 2005 yesterday aswell and got 12545
Posted: 07 Mar 2007, 15:05
by Hman
See, the CPU makes a huge difference. My score is only 1891 lower than yours. And Gouhan's is higher than yours.
Posted: 08 Mar 2007, 23:14
by jPm
12454 for a 8800gts, isn't that abit low? I'm not sure what they suppose to be.
I'm going to order mine tomorrow so wanted to findout.
That x1900xtx toxic got 14000+, should the 8800gts be faster?
Posted: 08 Mar 2007, 23:37
by DAE_JA_VOO
Hmmm yeah and my two 7800GTs get 12440, unclocked...
Posted: 09 Mar 2007, 09:33
by jPm
I got 10200 with my 7900gs overclocked. The 8800gts should get atleast 5000 more.
Otherwise it benchs the same as a 7900GTX-Stock
Maybe in 3D Mark 2006 there will be differences.
Posted: 09 Mar 2007, 10:03
by Molean
jPm wrote:I got 10200 with my 7900gs overclocked. The 8800gts should get atleast 5000 more.
Otherwise it benchs the same as a 7900GTX-Stock
Maybe in 3D Mark 2006 there will be differences.
I benched on an extremely dirty windows installation and what version driver is everybody using?
Posted: 09 Mar 2007, 11:18
by Hex_Rated
You are CPU limited. No matter how much power your graphics card has, your CPU is holding you back. Your score should increase if you raise the clock on your CPU. The toxic X1950XTX was running on a C2D at 3.4Ghz, you should get a slightly higer score if you use the same clock.
Posted: 09 Mar 2007, 11:37
by I34z1k
My word people. 8800's are very very processor reliant. You can easily get 15k maybe more with a gts with a better chip.
Posted: 04 Apr 2007, 15:32
by alanf85
I got a score of 12 250
on my new P.C
6400
2 gig ram
8800GTS 340mb
Not a very good score is it.
Posted: 04 Apr 2007, 15:43
by Hman
Only 12250?
Posted: 04 Apr 2007, 16:17
by alanf85
Got it up to 12 500
Posted: 04 Apr 2007, 16:29
by Hman
Still a bit low, I've got around 11K check a few pages back. And that's with my X1900GT, and my Opteron 170
Posted: 04 Apr 2007, 16:47
by Hex_Rated
Got it up to 12 500 Embarassed
What cpu and GPU clocks? If you're running stock, this is more or less normal. Also, drop the image quality settings to high performance in the nv control panel.
Posted: 09 Apr 2007, 21:02
by DoOb
8608
7800GTX @ 481 core / 1380 mem
Posted: 09 Apr 2007, 21:09
by I34z1k
Sorry buddy...
Posted: 09 Apr 2007, 21:14
by DoOb
DAM DAM DAM DAM
If you had my Chip and board i would pwned that score.
Here's another higher clock on the GFX card.
Posted: 09 Apr 2007, 21:17
by I34z1k
And I only used the gt
Posted: 09 May 2007, 17:01
by StormHorse
Posted: 13 May 2007, 19:33
by Gouhan
Radeon HD2900XT 512MB with X6800 @ 3.8GHz
21,716
Posted: 13 May 2007, 19:47
by Hman
Gouhan wrote:Radeon HD2900XT 512MB with X6800 @ 3.8GHz
21,716
May I marrry your pc? Or a at least that 2900XT.
Posted: 13 May 2007, 19:48
by I34z1k
*Throws brick
Posted: 13 May 2007, 21:29
by StormHorse
Hmm.. looks like it's time for me to come back again!!
