going for 200bclk over 133?
Posted: 23 Aug 2011, 11:29
I've already spoken to MT on getting my RAM working at 2000mhz and so far I've "overclocked" it to 1600mhz which already showed an improvement. Now I need to know something and I want more peoples opinions on this.
I want to try running my base clock at 200mhz and then set my cpu multiplier to 14 so I still get the 2.8ghz of my cpu. The current bclk is 133. What are the risks of changing the base clock? Should the system be stable? Or am I looking at another chernobyl?
I want to try running my base clock at 200mhz and then set my cpu multiplier to 14 so I still get the 2.8ghz of my cpu. The current bclk is 133. What are the risks of changing the base clock? Should the system be stable? Or am I looking at another chernobyl?