Yep. But it doesn't work for Google calendarSojourn wrote:on front page I have posted a link with an outlook import into cal
Super 15 - 2011
Forum rules
The global forum rules are found here.
NOTE: posts in this section are not counted towards your total.
The global forum rules are found here.
NOTE: posts in this section are not counted towards your total.
-
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 10000
- Joined: 05 Feb 2004, 02:00
- Processor: Intel i5-4690K @ 4.5GHZ
- Motherboard: ASUS Maximus VII Formula
- Graphics card: ASUS GTX970 Strix
- Memory: 4 x 4GB Corsair Dominators
- Location: Messing with your Mind
- Contact:
Re: Super 15 - 2011
Art Williams wrote:I'm not telling you it is going to be easy, I'm telling you it's going to be worth it.
Re: Super 15 - 2011
But works for outlook.Monty wrote:Yep. But it doesn't work for Google calendarSojourn wrote:on front page I have posted a link with an outlook import into cal
I will make log updates every Monday in the 3rd post.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: 03 Jun 2006, 02:00
Re: Super 15 - 2011
So any predictions on the local games? I have no idea what to expect from the Cheetah's and Sharks... very scared about the Lions... they owe SA a good season...
If you are at your Wits End...
Severed Fifth - Changing the way the music industry works, one song at a time!
Severed Fifth - Changing the way the music industry works, one song at a time!
Re: Super 15 - 2011
My team played poor, even considering the rainy conditions.
WTH is up with all that scrum issues?
Why is every good ball kicked away?
Don't tell me that is their wet weather game plan.
I also expected more from the Sharks.
WTH is up with all that scrum issues?
Why is every good ball kicked away?
Don't tell me that is their wet weather game plan.
I also expected more from the Sharks.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: 03 Jun 2006, 02:00
Re: Super 15 - 2011
Early engage against both teams... became tedious... Bulls sound lucky so far against the Lions... come on Bulls... !!Sojourn wrote:My team played poor, even considering the rainy conditions.
WTH is up with all that scrum issues?
Why is every good ball kicked away?
Don't tell me that is their wet weather game plan.
I also expected more from the Sharks.
If you are at your Wits End...
Severed Fifth - Changing the way the music industry works, one song at a time!
Severed Fifth - Changing the way the music industry works, one song at a time!
Re: Super 15 - 2011
Lions / Bulls game
Bulls were capitalising on penalties, something the Lions didn't do.
If you kick for touch 7 times, in stead of taking the points and end the game loosing with 4, you cannot blame the kicker (even though he missed some shockers).
That said, I would have been proud of the Cheetahs had they lost in the way the Lions did. The 2nd half all the Bulls could do was defend for their lives.
Bulls were capitalising on penalties, something the Lions didn't do.
If you kick for touch 7 times, in stead of taking the points and end the game loosing with 4, you cannot blame the kicker (even though he missed some shockers).
That said, I would have been proud of the Cheetahs had they lost in the way the Lions did. The 2nd half all the Bulls could do was defend for their lives.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 14085
- Joined: 06 Oct 2004, 02:00
- Location: Location, Location...
- Contact:
Re: Super 15 - 2011
And they almost didn't.
All the same, it's a win
All the same, it's a win
Re: Super 15 - 2011
What gets me is if you look at the footage, he made no attempt to use his arm, his shoulder is clearly turned to face into the man, and he took Cowan out while Cowan was in the air.Hurricanes second five eighth Ma’a Nonu has been suspended for one week after appearing at a SANZAR judicial hearing in Wellington.
Nonu received a yellow card for a professional foul 29 minutes into the first half, and was sanctioned with a second yellow card for a dangerous tackle on Highlanders halfback Jimmy Cowan, ten minutes into the second half. The second yellow card automatically resulted in a red card and he was sent off. Nonu was also later cited for the dangerous tackle.
After considering video evidence and hearing submissions from Nonu and his representatives, SANZAR Judicial Officer Nigel Hampton QC upheld the citing on the basis that Nonu did not use his arms in the tackle and the first impact was with his shoulder into Cowan’s neck.
Only 1 week? If this was Bakkies (not that I like him in this format of play) he would have been out for 2/3 weeks. Bloody agents !!
This also pi$$es me off to no end.Mr Hampton said he believed the tackle was at the lower end of the scale of seriousness, but mitigating factors included Nonu’s acceptance of guilt, and a written submission from Cowan in support of Nonu.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: 03 Jun 2006, 02:00
Re: Super 15 - 2011
Got this on a tweet:
NZ Herald rugby writer on Ma'a Nonu's one-week ban: 'If Bakkies Botha had delivered the same hit on Dan Carter, there would be an outcry.'
NZ Herald rugby writer on Ma'a Nonu's one-week ban: 'If Bakkies Botha had delivered the same hit on Dan Carter, there would be an outcry.'
If you are at your Wits End...
Severed Fifth - Changing the way the music industry works, one song at a time!
Severed Fifth - Changing the way the music industry works, one song at a time!
Re: Super 15 - 2011
The Hurricanes and the Crusaders game has been cancelled due to the tragic earthquake in Christchurch.
Each team will take away 2 points as if it were a draw.
I am glad sensibility reigned.
I really feel for those poor people down there.
Each team will take away 2 points as if it were a draw.
I am glad sensibility reigned.
I really feel for those poor people down there.
Re: Super 15 - 2011
The Cheetah and Lion games were almost mirror images of each other.
Bot had the game under control at one point, but lax defense and poor individual on-field decisions cost them both.
Both lost by 2 points after opposition tries were converted.
Both chucked away winning points by not converting kicks.
Both left me ugly disappointed.
I worried that the Cheetahs were able to hold the Boks.. argh I mean Bulls, off like that for big parts of the game.
The boks coaching staff will have to pay attention.
Bot had the game under control at one point, but lax defense and poor individual on-field decisions cost them both.
Both lost by 2 points after opposition tries were converted.
Both chucked away winning points by not converting kicks.
Both left me ugly disappointed.
I worried that the Cheetahs were able to hold the Boks.. argh I mean Bulls, off like that for big parts of the game.
The boks coaching staff will have to pay attention.
Re: Super 15 - 2011
So the Crusaders beat the Waratahs this morning 33-18.
CPU: AMD Phenom II X2 555 (OC'ed to 3.8Ghz)
CPU Cooler: CM Hyper TX3 P/P
GPU: Sapphire Radeon HD5850
Motherboard: Asus M4A785T-M
Memory: 4GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333
Case: Zalman Z7
Display: Samsung Syncmaster 2243BWX
CPU Cooler: CM Hyper TX3 P/P
GPU: Sapphire Radeon HD5850
Motherboard: Asus M4A785T-M
Memory: 4GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333
Case: Zalman Z7
Display: Samsung Syncmaster 2243BWX
Re: Super 15 - 2011
Yea, by SBru for this w-end started bad.
Everybody should have known they will make a big comeback after the disaster on the home front.
Everybody should have known they will make a big comeback after the disaster on the home front.
Re: Super 15 - 2011
I had Crusaders by 12 on SBru
Re: Super 15 - 2011
How would it suck if the vodacom logo got burnt onto my plasma screen. Pity the Lions lost they played a good game. Bulls will take it tonight...
Re: Super 15 - 2011
ofc they will. Oh wait...senile wrote:Bulls will take it tonight...
Re: Super 15 - 2011
They took it very well. I will not type from which direction they took it because it's a family forumSojourn wrote:
ofc they will. Oh wait...
So close for the Toyota Cheetas, but again it's the discipline that let them down.
Re: Super 15 - 2011
Woohoo.
Sharks won their first tour match and the Bulls lost at home against a mediocre Highlanders outfit. hahaha!
Sharks won their first tour match and the Bulls lost at home against a mediocre Highlanders outfit. hahaha!
CPU: AMD Phenom II X2 555 (OC'ed to 3.8Ghz)
CPU Cooler: CM Hyper TX3 P/P
GPU: Sapphire Radeon HD5850
Motherboard: Asus M4A785T-M
Memory: 4GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333
Case: Zalman Z7
Display: Samsung Syncmaster 2243BWX
CPU Cooler: CM Hyper TX3 P/P
GPU: Sapphire Radeon HD5850
Motherboard: Asus M4A785T-M
Memory: 4GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333
Case: Zalman Z7
Display: Samsung Syncmaster 2243BWX
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 49984
- Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 21:55
- Location: Searching for a way back throught the lookingglass
Re: Super 15 - 2011
Someone explain to me what the big whoo haa was aout having a results post if no results are posted
"I hear voices in my head but they are my own this time"
"Except for a battle lost, there is nothing so terrible as a battle won."
"Sanity is for the weak!!"
"Except for a battle lost, there is nothing so terrible as a battle won."
"Sanity is for the weak!!"
Re: Super 15 - 2011
Sidey was suspended for three weeks for that dangerous tackle against Ndungane.
Luckaly he seems to have shrug it off, but it was quite a scare.
So... do you feel 3 weeks are enough considering Jean Smith got 4 weeks for his sideways tackle and Bakkies got 9 weeks for his head games? I don't.
The down-under teams will always get off lighter, fact we have to make peace with.
Luckaly he seems to have shrug it off, but it was quite a scare.
So... do you feel 3 weeks are enough considering Jean Smith got 4 weeks for his sideways tackle and Bakkies got 9 weeks for his head games? I don't.
The down-under teams will always get off lighter, fact we have to make peace with.
Re: Super 15 - 2011
I feel that in comparison with Juan Smith's ban of 4 weeks, I think he got of very lightly. But I think they also take into account your previous misdemeanors and Bakkies is no angel. Bakkies is basically a repeat offender.
If you look at it in the context of severity only, then yes, he should have probably been banned for the season. That was very dangerous and dare I say premeditated.
If you look at it in the context of severity only, then yes, he should have probably been banned for the season. That was very dangerous and dare I say premeditated.
CPU: AMD Phenom II X2 555 (OC'ed to 3.8Ghz)
CPU Cooler: CM Hyper TX3 P/P
GPU: Sapphire Radeon HD5850
Motherboard: Asus M4A785T-M
Memory: 4GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333
Case: Zalman Z7
Display: Samsung Syncmaster 2243BWX
CPU Cooler: CM Hyper TX3 P/P
GPU: Sapphire Radeon HD5850
Motherboard: Asus M4A785T-M
Memory: 4GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333
Case: Zalman Z7
Display: Samsung Syncmaster 2243BWX
Re: Super 15 - 2011
Ill do that today.CapNemo wrote:Someone explain to me what the big whoo haa was about having a results post if no results are posted
Re: Super 15 - 2011
Icepick, all I ask for is consistency.
If infringement X is punished by 1 week and infringement Y is punished by 6 weeks, it needs to remain that way no matter what name or nationality caused it.
If infringement X is punished by 1 week and infringement Y is punished by 6 weeks, it needs to remain that way no matter what name or nationality caused it.
Re: Super 15 - 2011
I feel the same way. It seems the SA sides are always punished harsher than the OZ and AUS sides.Sojourn wrote:Icepick, all I ask for is consistency.
If infringement X is punished by 1 week and infringement Y is punished by 6 weeks, it needs to remain that way no matter what name or nationality caused it.
But I can also see the other side of the coin. If the person is a repeat offender, then the punishment is harsher and they also look if he intended to hurt the other player.
I've played a lot of rugby and I can tell you that a spear tackle happens in a split second without me (the tackler) even trying to do it intentionally. So all these things get taken in account at the hearing.
But I do agree with you. Infringement A must always carry a ban of x weeks and so forth. I think then the players will know that when they do that, their punishment will be that.
CPU: AMD Phenom II X2 555 (OC'ed to 3.8Ghz)
CPU Cooler: CM Hyper TX3 P/P
GPU: Sapphire Radeon HD5850
Motherboard: Asus M4A785T-M
Memory: 4GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333
Case: Zalman Z7
Display: Samsung Syncmaster 2243BWX
CPU Cooler: CM Hyper TX3 P/P
GPU: Sapphire Radeon HD5850
Motherboard: Asus M4A785T-M
Memory: 4GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333
Case: Zalman Z7
Display: Samsung Syncmaster 2243BWX
-
- Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 5736
- Joined: 11 Sep 2004, 02:00
- Location: looking over your shoulder
Re: Super 15 - 2011
There is a major difference between an unintentional spear tackle which happens like you say in a twitch of a second and grinding your boots into the ground and getting down low for itIcePick88 wrote:I feel the same way. It seems the SA sides are always punished harsher than the OZ and AUS sides.Sojourn wrote:Icepick, all I ask for is consistency.
If infringement X is punished by 1 week and infringement Y is punished by 6 weeks, it needs to remain that way no matter what name or nationality caused it.
But I can also see the other side of the coin. If the person is a repeat offender, then the punishment is harsher and they also look if he intended to hurt the other player.
I've played a lot of rugby and I can tell you that a spear tackle happens in a split second without me (the tackler) even trying to do it intentionally. So all these things get taken in account at the hearing.
But I do agree with you. Infringement A must always carry a ban of x weeks and so forth. I think then the players will know that when they do that, their punishment will be that.
Watashi no ikari wa anata no tamashī wa heiwa o fukushū to eien no o mitsukeru.
TROPICAL AQUARIUMS <---My hobby