Page 1 of 1
2010 - Least Intelligible Member
Posted: 17 Oct 2010, 22:09
by Ron2K
We have in this category:
Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member
Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 06:03
by Tribble
What is Kalster's name doing here?
Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member
Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 06:27
by jee
you can ask that again..... i think someone missed the "least" part...
Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member
Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 06:29
by CapNemo
Maybe someone who doesn't understand what he said or a personal feud?
Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member
Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 06:38
by Tribble
Yeah - strange that. I would never have put him here. Personally I don't like this thread
Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member
Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 07:42
by wizardofid
Tribble wrote:Yeah - strange that. I would never have put him here. Personally I don't like this thread
Every village needs an idiot it just so happens that another idiot decided to vote for the wrong person, this should get that person the title automatically...
Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member
Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 07:53
by doo_much
The award is for Least
Intelligible Member. Not Least
Intelligent Member.
Else we'd have nominated STD.
Maybe what he says is just totally incomprehensible to one of the other forumites?
Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member
Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 07:56
by KALSTER
I do sometimes write as if the sentence order was chosen randomly.
Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member
Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 09:49
by ADT
doo_much wrote:The award is for Least
Intelligible Member. Not Least
Intelligent Member.
Else we'd have nominated STD.
Maybe what he says is just totally incomprehensible to one of the other forumites?
Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member
Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 10:11
by rustypup
i believe the issue may be that KALSTER sometimes uses the most confusing of literary devices out there...
the dreaded Paragraph!...
given that few, if any, internet users have the short-term memory retention required to process a sentence consisting of more than 7 words, this nomination is entirely believable.... wrong, but understandable...
Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member
Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 10:15
by ADT
StoneIce will anyway "Win" KALSTER so don't be alarmed, if anyone has been to the afr thread - you'd understand
Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member
Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 10:16
by D3PART3D
Kalster was probably just a joke nomination. Someone didn't want stoned-ice to feel lonely.
Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member
Posted: 19 Oct 2010, 20:17
by DeathPing
This Award totally sucks! :thumbdown:
It should be removed, imho.
Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member
Posted: 19 Oct 2010, 20:21
by doo_much
Your
opinion doesn't count.
Nou sharrup en gaan stem vir Klippies!
Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member
Posted: 18 Mar 2016, 16:35
by GDI_Lord
I think this is posted in the wrong section...
Also, Belarus? Are you related to the more famous Cameron that hasn't been seen here for a while?