The Meteor of 21 November, 2009
Forum rules
Please read the discussion section rules before posting in here. By posting in this section, you acknowledge to have read and understood them, and agree to abide by them at all times.
Of course, the global forum rules apply here too.
NOTE: posts in this section are not counted towards your total.
Please read the discussion section rules before posting in here. By posting in this section, you acknowledge to have read and understood them, and agree to abide by them at all times.
Of course, the global forum rules apply here too.
NOTE: posts in this section are not counted towards your total.
Re: The Meteor of 21 November, 2009
I think they're meh because it's a piece of rock which is not all that uncommon if we're honest about it. Sure, maybe it's infested with alien bacteria bent on world destruction, only to be taken out by earthly viruses which cannot harm Tom Cruise despite being a willy of a father to a snotnosed brat of a son...but still, it's juts not that exciting.
to ápeiro anima
Re: The Meteor of 21 November, 2009
Not much more to be excited about. Bright flash. No rock found. No sudden infestation of Justin Timberlake clones across Gauteng. You have to admit that it's kinda meh.
lol ok.-
Tribble
- Registered User
- Posts: 88465
- Joined: 08 Feb 2007, 02:00
- Processor: Intel Core i7-4770K CPU@3.50GHz
- Motherboard: ACPI x64-based PC
- Graphics card: GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- Memory: 16GB
- Location: Not here
- Contact:
Re: The Meteor of 21 November, 2009
Surely anything that was living on the rock would have burned up in the atmosphere on entry?
Re: The Meteor of 21 November, 2009
Good question. Should I ever come within firing range of Justin Timberlake I will gladly attempt to set him alight to test this theory and to rid the world of his "music."Tribble wrote:Why not them? Surely they are flammable