On the one hand, how immature to be making fun of someone else's choice in love.
On the other, being so blind that you can't see why other people may not agree that your chosen wife is the uber-hawtness is just proof that you see the same flaws and are trying to convince yourself otherwise. The biggest fool is the fool that fools himself!
Ceterum autem censeo Samsung Mobile esse delendam.
When something is important enough, you do it even if the odds are not in your favor.
- Elon Musk
How dare you talk about my wife like that, you are lucky I am in the military and am considered a deadly weapon or I would fight you in her honor. As for children we have one on the way now, which is why I married her. She is upset about losing her figure but I still think she looks great.
C'mon ... with a comment like that you can't tell me you're taking this seriously?
How dare you talk about my wife like that, you are lucky I am in the military and am considered a deadly weapon or I would fight you in her honor. As for children we have one on the way now, which is why I married her. She is upset about losing her figure but I still think she looks great.
C'mon ... with a comment like that you can't tell me you're taking this seriously?
Of course it's a troll.
The sad thing is that these people are real though. I suppose love is blind, so all the best to them.
I did have a good laugh at the first few pages though, until it got outta hand.
The pics are obviously real, not the poster. He talks about losing his virginity on their wedding night, last weekend, and then disses people for making hateful comments about his unborn child.
Synthesis wrote:The pics are obviously real, not the poster. He talks about losing his virginity on their wedding night, last weekend, and then disses people for making hateful comments about his unborn child.
jamin_za wrote:Whether the OP was really the guy in the pics is irrelevant.
The fact remains that somewhere out there some guy is married to that ? girl ?
Haha! "I didn't know big foot's could mate with Chupacapra..."
Ah - so it is true then. To you guys - the packaging is more important than the contents. We had a thread about a year ago when all the guys denied this fact - it is her personality that counts - not her looks.
BUSTED!!!!!!!!!!!
(Yes - I did laugh too. But it is their choice - not mine)
Tribble wrote:Ah - so it is true then. To you guys - the packaging is more important than the contents. We had a thread about a year ago when all the guys denied this fact - it is her personality that counts - not her looks.
BUSTED!!!!!!!!!!!
(Yes - I did laugh too. But it is their choice - not mine)
Contents is more important than packaging...but then, do you walk into a bar/club/social gathering/swingers ball/4chan convention and hit on the ugly person, 'cos they MIGHT have a nice personality, or do you hit on the blonde in a g-string touching her toes?
Tribble wrote:Ah - so it is true then. To you guys - the packaging is more important than the contents. We had a thread about a year ago when all the guys denied this fact - it is her personality that counts - not her looks.
No one is retracting their statements from this alleged thread of yours. But if there is SO MUCH packaging the contents MUST be pretty insignificant.
Or do you get to know the person and then judge them? At least you are honest Bruce - most of the other guys would swear that they would get to know her first.