Page 4 of 5

Posted: 12 Jul 2007, 09:27
by maxxis
schase wrote:The time setting on your site is 2 hours out! Must be set for GMT rather than +2.
Seems like the blog is not reading the site setting for time.

Ill fix this quick

Posted: 12 Jul 2007, 09:37
by ravenlord
Site is looking good so far Dae

Posted: 12 Jul 2007, 09:48
by DAE_JA_VOO
Dont compliment me, compliment maxxis, he made it :D

I'm just putting up the content like pics and so on, so if you like THAT stuff, thanks :D

Posted: 13 Jul 2007, 18:54
by DAE_JA_VOO
Big update guys. Been working my butt off. The site is almost done. One or two things i still need to do, iron a few things out, but it's almost done.

I've posted a full description on all my mods, as well as links to my sponsors and the first modding guide is up. That guide is a more detailed version of the one that will appear in the August PCFormat.

Have a look and let me know what you think so far please :D

DAEJAVOO.com

Posted: 13 Jul 2007, 19:04
by Druggs
the site is looking great so far :D

Posted: 13 Jul 2007, 20:12
by PFS
DJV, site is taking shape and looking really really great. congrads.

PFS*

Posted: 13 Jul 2007, 21:21
by jcd
Who should I congratulate the most?

DaeJaVoo or Maxxis?

great job both of you!

Posted: 13 Jul 2007, 21:25
by Friggs
Cool man, sites looking good!

Posted: 13 Jul 2007, 23:40
by DAE_JA_VOO
Thanks Guys :D

jcd, you should congratulate maxxis for the site itself, and me for everything ON the site :P

Posted: 14 Jul 2007, 11:01
by Moses
Dae ja voo. Your led mod guide is good, but you need to specify the LED voltages, as well as the resistor values. Saying you need 2 resistors in parallel and one in series is completely arbitrary - you could just as well use one resistor if it had the desired resistance! Rather say, 'because I only had resistors with value X, I connected 2 in parallel and 1 in series to achieve the desired resistance Y'.

Posted: 14 Jul 2007, 11:28
by DAE_JA_VOO
I actually went and found out ALL the exact specs of the resistors and LEDs that i used, and it IS in the guide moses ;)

1K resistors, 3.5V LEDs.

Posted: 14 Jul 2007, 11:52
by Moses
DAE_JA_VOO wrote:I actually went and found out ALL the exact specs of the resistors and LEDs that i used, and it IS in the guide moses ;)

1K resistors, 3.5V LEDs.
Oh, I saw it now! :oops: Yeah, good enough. I suppose your guide is aimed at the layman, but it probably wouldn't hurt to mention that a single 1.5k resistor would also do the trick!

Posted: 14 Jul 2007, 12:26
by DAE_JA_VOO
Moses wrote:
DAE_JA_VOO wrote:I actually went and found out ALL the exact specs of the resistors and LEDs that i used, and it IS in the guide moses ;)

1K resistors, 3.5V LEDs.
Oh, I saw it now! :oops: Yeah, good enough. I suppose your guide is aimed at the layman, but it probably wouldn't hurt to mention that a single 1.5k resistor would also do the trick!
LOL!! How am i supposed to know that!? :P

Are you sure about that though? Can i add that to the guide?

Posted: 14 Jul 2007, 12:34
by Moses
DAE_JA_VOO wrote:
LOL!! How am i supposed to know that!? :P

Are you sure about that though? Can i add that to the guide?
Yeah! That combination you used is equivalent to a single 1.5k resistor. Test it with a multimeter! Measure across the whole section, should be 1.5k. Two 3k resistors in parallel would also be equivalent to a single 1.5k resistor.

Theory:

two resistors (X and Y) in series are added like this:

X + Y (eg. 3 + 3 = 6)

two resistors (X and Y) in parallel are added like this:


1/(1/X + 1/Y) eg. 1/(1/3 + 1/3) = 1.5

Posted: 14 Jul 2007, 12:34
by WiK1d
DAE_JA_VOO wrote:
Moses wrote:
DAE_JA_VOO wrote:I actually went and found out ALL the exact specs of the resistors and LEDs that i used, and it IS in the guide moses ;)

1K resistors, 3.5V LEDs.
Oh, I saw it now! :oops: Yeah, good enough. I suppose your guide is aimed at the layman, but it probably wouldn't hurt to mention that a single 1.5k resistor would also do the trick!
LOL!! How am i supposed to know that!? :P

Are you sure about that though? Can i add that to the guide?
Yup, it is 1.5K ;)
Moses wrote:1/(1/X + 1/Y) eg. 1/(1/3 + 1/3) = 1.5
What moses is trying to say is this:

Image

And then after you added the values to your right you swop the top value with the bottom one to get R

Posted: 14 Jul 2007, 12:40
by DAE_JA_VOO
Wow, i actually did all of that crap in school, never thought i'd implement it in real life (not that i did, you guys did it for me :P )

Thanks Moses, i'll add it now. Check again in 5 minutes :P

Re: DAE_JA_VOO.com (update!)

Posted: 25 May 2010, 02:33
by DAE_JA_VOO
Hey dudes!

Just thought I'd let you know - my website has undergone a complete upgrade! I've spent a lot of time on this update, so please do check it out.

I decided to go with an upgrade now, as modding is really, really taking off for me. I'm doing big projects (NAG) and I've been offered even bigger sponsors now (Dremel), so I really feel like an upgrade is necessary.

Please go ahead and visit the site and let me know what you think. I'd love it if you guys could test some stuff for me too. Post some comments, link to facebook/twitter, etc, let me know if everything is working fine :)

A little screenie:

Image

Re: DAE_JA_VOO.com (HUGE Update!)

Posted: 25 May 2010, 07:13
by ryanrich
Very nice dude, huge upgrade that!

Re: DAE_JA_VOO.com (HUGE Update!)

Posted: 25 May 2010, 07:31
by D3PART3D
Neat!

Re: DAE_JA_VOO.com (HUGE Update!)

Posted: 25 May 2010, 09:21
by DAE_JA_VOO
Thanks guys! :D Play around with some of the stuff if you have time, please :D

Re: DAE_JA_VOO.com (HUGE Update!)

Posted: 26 May 2010, 15:36
by Studio Touch Visagie
Some of the pictures on your camera are blurry, maybe check the lens for oily spots. Is it a canon or sony ericsson?

Re: DAE_JA_VOO.com (HUGE Update!)

Posted: 26 May 2010, 15:44
by Prime
Studio Touch Visagie wrote:Some of the pictures on your camera are blurry, maybe check the lens for oily spots. Is it a canon or sony ericsson?
You mean depth of field? Its intentional.

Re: DAE_JA_VOO.com (HUGE Update!)

Posted: 26 May 2010, 15:47
by DAE_JA_VOO
Studio Touch Visagie wrote:Some of the pictures on your camera are blurry, maybe check the lens for oily spots. Is it a canon or sony ericsson?
Do sony ericsson make SLRs?

Anyway, yeah, the Depth of Field is intentional. The aperture on the first Atari shoot was way too open though, I know.

Re: DAE_JA_VOO.com (HUGE Update!)

Posted: 27 May 2010, 07:38
by Studio Touch Visagie
I don't understand why people find depth of field so appealing. It ruins the pictures but thats my opinion. Anyway, good luck with you web site

Re: DAE_JA_VOO.com (HUGE Update!)

Posted: 27 May 2010, 10:27
by DAE_JA_VOO
Cool, thanks man :)