Page 2 of 2

Posted: 14 Dec 2007, 08:06
by DAE_JA_VOO
DarkRanger wrote:
maxxis wrote:Remove the banner advert in your sig please.

Advertising like that is not allowed.
same to your sig maxxis.
Whoa!!!

No no no, maxxis is allowed to do that. Same as my sig. You're allowed to have a BANNER with anything you want, hell, i could have a Prophecy banner if i want, but that banner may not LINK to the site. ;)

That's how i link to my site AND my forum in my sig, by text, not by banner ;)

Posted: 14 Dec 2007, 08:17
by GreyWolf
Why did they decide to put the persons id on the right? why? makes no sense! otherwise it looks ok to me, actually am part of another forum that has already adopted it.

Posted: 14 Dec 2007, 08:35
by DAE_JA_VOO
GreyWolf wrote:Why did they decide to put the persons id on the right? why? makes no sense! otherwise it looks ok to me, actually am part of another forum that has already adopted it.
It's not always like that, it all depends on your theme. Look at mine (www.daejavoo.com/forum) and you'll see the IDs on the left.

Posted: 14 Dec 2007, 08:38
by maxxis
DarkRanger wrote:
maxxis wrote:Remove the banner advert in your sig please.

Advertising like that is not allowed.
same to your sig maxxis.
And what exactly am I advertising? Read the forum rules again.

6) No advertising or self promotion. If you are a regular user you may announce your site in the forum once, there after you are only allowed to have a link in your signature (no banners). Please don’t just join to advertise on the forum, it will get deleted/locked.

Posted: 14 Dec 2007, 08:43
by maxxis

Posted: 14 Dec 2007, 08:46
by Stuart
DAE_JA_VOO wrote:
DarkRanger wrote:
maxxis wrote:Remove the banner advert in your sig please.

Advertising like that is not allowed.
same to your sig maxxis.
Whoa!!!

No no no, maxxis is allowed to do that. Same as my sig. You're allowed to have a BANNER with anything you want, hell, i could have a Prophecy banner if i want, but that banner may not LINK to the site. ;)

That's how i link to my site AND my forum in my sig, by text, not by banner ;)
I am not trying to dispute rules here, but why exactly does that rule exist? What's the difference between linking to your site in a banner and linking to your site by text?

Posted: 14 Dec 2007, 08:51
by Hman
One looks nicer.

Posted: 14 Dec 2007, 09:03
by simmy
Hman wrote:One looks nicer.
Image

Posted: 14 Dec 2007, 09:13
by DarkRanger
you know whats funny maxxis. Before your banner changed to delayed to 2008, you had lind to your cad site. But then it was fine.

Like schase said, whats the Difference between a url link and a banner link to the same site??

Re: What this forum may look like in the future...

Posted: 14 Dec 2007, 09:17
by rustypup
<OT>
Ron2K wrote:a new style that looks very Web 2.0.
there's a special circle of hell prepared for anyone found using that particular little bit of marketing blurb...

whoever first coined that phrase should have their eyes gouged out with a blunt teaspoon...
</OT>

all that aside, it looks ok-ish... not 'wow!' but ok. the feature updates look interesting....

Posted: 14 Dec 2007, 09:23
by maxxis
DarkRanger wrote:you know whats funny maxxis. Before your banner changed to delayed to 2008, you had lind to your cad site. But then it was fine.

Like schase said, whats the Difference between a url link and a banner link to the same site??
In all honesty Cameron made the rules. I would imagine that a sig with link would be more prominent and therefor the clicks will be more.

I know I had to linked to the cad site. When Cameron imposed the amended advertising rule I changed it immediately.

Posted: 14 Dec 2007, 09:35
by DarkRanger
oh so the rule was only added recently? my bad then! sorry maxxis.

Posted: 14 Dec 2007, 10:14
by Ron2K
GreyWolf wrote:Why did they decide to put the persons id on the right? why? makes no sense! otherwise it looks ok to me, actually am part of another forum that has already adopted it.
The reason given by the development team is that it places more emphasis on the post content and less on the actual poster. There was quite a lot of mixed opinion on this - ask me nicely and I'll find the relevant discussion threads for you. That being said, for the styles based on the new prosilver style, changing the user info from right to left and vice versa is apparently as easy as changing a few lines of CSS code, if you're willing to get your hands dirty.
rustypup wrote:there's a special circle of hell prepared for anyone found using that particular little bit of marketing blurb...

whoever first coined that phrase should have their eyes gouged out with a blunt teaspoon...
:lol:

Posted: 14 Dec 2007, 10:19
by Hman
simmy wrote:
Hman wrote:One looks nicer.
Image
*takes a bow*

Posted: 14 Dec 2007, 10:23
by Cameron_Losco
/Off topic

I've explained the whole banner and link story here.

Posted: 14 Dec 2007, 10:27
by Ron2K
What's changed between phpBB 2 and phpBB 3, for all those who are interested.

If I were to pick a favourite new feature, it has to be the "you got beaten at posting" notification.