Megan Fox

americantsm1 · Post by **americantsm1** » 23 Jul 2009, 10:26

meh ... she is too skinny and her expression is a clear representation of what is going on upstairs ... vapid ...

personal taste thing ... I don;t find her hot ... yes maybe her body is semi-okay but bobble-heads are not big on my list

better Mr Doo??

doo_much · Post by **doo_much** » 23 Jul 2009, 10:28

OK stop spamming and lets get this thread back on track.
Anyway I believe all the real men in here will agree with jamin's statement.

so.

Post by **Anakha56** » 23 Jul 2009, 10:29

americantsm1 wrote:meh ... she is too skinny and her expression is a clear representation of what is going on upstairs ... vapid ...

personal taste thing ... I don;t find her hot ... yes maybe her body is semi-okay but bobble-heads are not big on my list

better Mr Doo??

Hot enough to distract your grammar though

.

doo_much · Post by **doo_much** » 23 Jul 2009, 10:32

americantsm1 wrote:meh ... she is too skinny and her expression is a clear representation of what is going on upstairs ... vapid ...

personal taste thing ... I don;t find her hot ... yes maybe her body is semi-okay but bobble-heads are not big on my list

better Mr Doo??

Skinny can be fixed....

Anakha56 wrote: Hot enough to distract your grammar though .

ROFL

americantsm1 · Post by **americantsm1** » 23 Jul 2009, 10:42

so sorry that I made a typo while spamming and working

just one problem pics were posted of her after I typed ... so she can't be that distracting ... and there is that vapid expression again she has it in every single photo

Ryan_Cooper · Post by **Ryan_Cooper** » 23 Jul 2009, 11:45

who's Megan Fox???????

americantsm1 · Post by **americantsm1** » 23 Jul 2009, 11:52

@ RC lol

Tribble · Post by **Tribble** » 23 Jul 2009, 11:53

Ja - we know he is just trying to hide his interest in her

Post by **Stuart** » 23 Jul 2009, 12:49

GreyWolf wrote:People people people, its Transformers we are talking about. NOTHING in that movie contributed any real value. Lets analyze some shall we:

Spitting robots: value = 0
Farting Robots: value = 0
Worldwide announcement that evil huge robots exist and are here to get 1 boy: plot value = 0
Owning a BRAND NEW CAMARO 1st year of varsity is a BAD thing: realism value = 0
Huge chrome cat robot: "robots in disguise" value = 0
Cliche "black" robots: racial tolerance value = 0

C'mon ... the Linkin Park sound track adds SOME value to it.

The film wasn't THAT bad; just not as captivating as the first one.

americantsm1 wrote:meh ... she is too skinny and her expression is a clear representation of what is going on upstairs ... vapid ...

personal taste thing ... I don;t find her hot ... yes maybe her body is semi-okay but bobble-heads are not big on my list

better Mr Doo??

Look, she has some natural beauty, no doubt. But I think that c0d3r summed it up nicely: she's made up to look like a hooker.

Ryan_Cooper wrote:who's Megan Fox???????

See ... Ryan found the slow-mo scene so distracting he didn't even get her name.

Ryan_Cooper · Post by **Ryan_Cooper** » 23 Jul 2009, 13:06

Ok firstly I havent really watched Transformers 2 (except the beginning...oooohh that scene where she sits on the bike) but anyway, yes her acting sucks and that was apparent in the first one as well which is why there was so little of her, the fact they had her dressed in skimpy outfits and had the slow mo scene...which I havent seen yet, just points out that as much as die hard fans didnt like it or parents watching tried to close thier horny teen children's eyes....sex sells end of point........

and yes she is attractive, but not as attractive as most good veteran actresses out there.

Post by **Stuart** » 23 Jul 2009, 13:24

Ryan_Cooper wrote:and yes she is attractive, but not as attractive as most good veteran actresses out there.

SOME veteran actresses. I wouldn't necessarily say that MOST veteran actresses are that attractive. I somehow don't see anyone with a Joan Cusack centrefold above their bed.

GreyWolf · Post by **GreyWolf** » 23 Jul 2009, 13:50

has anyone seen pictures of her gimp thumb? nasty.

http://www.bittenandbound.com/2009/06/1 ... -pictures/

Bladerunner · Post by **Bladerunner** » 23 Jul 2009, 13:55

GreyWolf wrote:has anyone seen pictures of her gimp thumb? nasty.

http://www.bittenandbound.com/2009/06/1 ... -pictures/

To sum it up in one word: Ewwzor...

americantsm1 · Post by **americantsm1** » 23 Jul 2009, 14:51

I am kind of a fan of that natural healthy beauty thing ... call me insane ... (which people do trust me)

but yah natural healthy beauty not skinny I have to pile on makeup to look perfect and wear short outfits kind of "beautiful" but of course to each his/her own! And there are people out there like this!

Post by **Stuart** » 23 Jul 2009, 14:57

americantsm1 wrote:I am kind of a fan of that natural healthy beauty thing ... call me insane ... (which people do trust me)

but yah natural healthy beauty not skinny I have to pile on makeup to look perfect and wear short outfits kind of "beautiful" but of course to each his/her own! And there are people out there like this!

I agree wholeheartedly. What I am saying is that if she DIDN'T dress all skimpy, and DIDN'T pile on enough makeup to require a paint scraper to get it off again, she would actually be quite good looking.

Tribble · Post by **Tribble** » 23 Jul 2009, 14:59

Bladerunner wrote:
GreyWolf wrote:has anyone seen pictures of her gimp thumb? nasty.

http://www.bittenandbound.com/2009/06/1 ... -pictures/
To sum it up in one word: Ewwzor...

Shame = the poor girl. I would be thrilled to have a thumb like that if the rest of my body looked like hers

I dunno - you would think that something that mundane wouldn't matter

Post by **Stuart** » 23 Jul 2009, 15:00

Tribble wrote:
Bladerunner wrote:
GreyWolf wrote:has anyone seen pictures of her gimp thumb? nasty.

http://www.bittenandbound.com/2009/06/1 ... -pictures/
To sum it up in one word: Ewwzor...
Shame = the poor girl. I would be thrilled to have a thumb like that if the rest of my body looked like hers I dunno - you would think that something that mundane wouldn't matter

I'll give this comment a thumbs up.

(Sorry, had to do that before c0d3r gets here again.)

americantsm1 · Post by **americantsm1** » 23 Jul 2009, 15:01

@ Stu lol I know I am agreeing with you think Erica Durance eh?

Post by **Stuart** » 23 Jul 2009, 15:04

americantsm1 wrote:@ Stu lol I know I am agreeing with you think Erica Durance eh?

I kinda prefer Oom Doo's earlier reference to Ms. Connely.

Or I'd settle for Laura Vandervoort, if we have to take Smallville characters.

americantsm1 · Post by **americantsm1** » 23 Jul 2009, 15:05

bwaaa hahaha sheesh seriously ... who cares! my toes are spastic

GreyWolf · Post by **GreyWolf** » 23 Jul 2009, 15:55

Tribble wrote:
Bladerunner wrote:Shame = the poor girl. I would be thrilled to have a thumb like that if the rest of my body looked like hers I dunno - you would think that something that mundane wouldn't matter

so imagine you order your favorite food, and the best chef in the world prepares it, and it arrives at your table and it looks AWESOME and the aroma is FANTASTIC!

and then you take a closer look and find a dead baby roach among the vegetables.

Megan's thumbs are like that F*****G roach.

Seriously, **** that roach.

Website · Post by **hamin_aus** » 23 Jul 2009, 16:18

americantsm1 wrote:my toes are spastic

Pics or it didn't happen.

doo_much · Post by **doo_much** » 23 Jul 2009, 20:04

jamin_za wrote:
americantsm1 wrote:my toes are spastic
Pics or it didn't happen.

-12569856324

Please.

doo_much · Post by **doo_much** » 23 Jul 2009, 20:36

This is totally WRONG...

Please don't click this linkif you're female, easily burst out crying or Stuart.

Faaark.

RIP Megan Fox. No pun...

Post by **Stuart** » 23 Jul 2009, 21:13

doo_much wrote:This is totally WRONG...

Please don't click this linkif you're female, easily burst out crying or Stuart.

Faaark.

RIP Megan Fox. No pun...

Bwahahahahahahaha! Nice find Oom Doo!

PCFormat Forum Archive

Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox

Re: Megan Fox