Israel Hezbolla conflict

Formerly known as "The Ward" -- now Anakha56 and rustypup's playground. Abandon all hope, all ye who enter.
Forum rules
The global forum rules are found here.

NOTE: posts in this section are not counted towards your total.
User avatar
hamin_aus
Forum Moderator
Posts: 18363
Joined: 28 Aug 2003, 02:00
Processor: Intel i7 3770K
Motherboard: GA-Z77X-UP4 TH
Graphics card: Galax GTX1080
Memory: 32GB G.Skill Ripjaws
Location: Where beer does flow and men chunder
Contact:

Post by hamin_aus »

Ike wrote:Do you really think a country with a space program doesn't have the means to biuld a ICBM?.
Even if they have built one - they have not successfully tested it AFAIK. Because as soon as they do US satellites would pick it up. And this has not happened.
-> harsh weather may stop an 1940's army... But not a modern one.
Tell that to the US ground forces in Iraq :?
->Do you know how large russia is? Check a map-> moscow's fallout wont even reach khazakstan...
Thats the second time you have told me to check a map, and you logic (?) is flawed.

:arrow: http://www.chernobyl.info/index.php?navID=2

The intial fallout zone from the Chernobyl meldown measured between 125 000 and 146 000 km2.
After a few days, the weather pattern had blown contamination over large parts of Scandinavia, Poland and the Baltic states, as well as southern Germany, Switzerland, northern France and England.
And the chernobyl meltdown delived only a fraction of the payload that a proper nuke, or worse, a thermonuke would provide.
In chernobyl's case, the prevailing winds blew the clouds west over Europe, but if winds are blowing the other way after the nuke is dropped, all of asia will be a contamination zone.
Thanks for playing, though.
Image
User avatar
hamin_aus
Forum Moderator
Posts: 18363
Joined: 28 Aug 2003, 02:00
Processor: Intel i7 3770K
Motherboard: GA-Z77X-UP4 TH
Graphics card: Galax GTX1080
Memory: 32GB G.Skill Ripjaws
Location: Where beer does flow and men chunder
Contact:

Post by hamin_aus »

Zell wrote:The Syrian and Iranian governments are responsible for this whole conflict.
Iran supplied the missiles and katyusha rockets that are being fired every day.
And why dont the Israeli's go for the head of the snake and attack Iran :?:

Well, probably because it is easier to fight a few rag-tag terrorist cowards than it is to fight a 400 000 strong well trained army that will go toe-to-toe with the IDF on the Iranian border.
Image
Zell
Permanently Banned
Posts: 6270
Joined: 14 Mar 2005, 02:00

Post by Zell »

jamin_za wrote:
Zell wrote:The Syrian and Iranian governments are responsible for this whole conflict.
Iran supplied the missiles and katyusha rockets that are being fired every day.
And why dont the Israeli's go for the head of the snake and attack Iran :?:

Well, probably because it is easier to fight a few rag-tag terrorist cowards than it is to fight a 400 000 strong well trained army that will go toe-to-toe with the IDF on the Iranian border.
Well in case you don't know, those rag-tag terrorist cowards are firing up to 200 rockets and missiles every day into Israel. So even if Israel goes for the head of the snake, Israel must eliminate the projectiles being launched into Israel.

And its not so easy to just take out the snake... I'm not so sure Israel can take on Iran, Syria and the terrorists if it is having so much trouble already with those rag-tag fools.
And we don't know what those dodgy snake-head **** have up their sleeve either. If america will get involved, Israel will probably try pwn them, but if America has no interest, Israel might just not have the power to accomplish it atm.
Lobster
Registered User
Posts: 17
Joined: 18 Sep 2005, 02:00

Post by Lobster »

I think U.S.A will get involved!

And I think Isreal will pawn Syria one time!
Although since the last war, Syria has built 1
massive tank force!
QBM
Registered User
Posts: 1850
Joined: 19 Jul 2005, 02:00

Post by QBM »

holy ****.............do you people ever look anything up before you start typing? The ignorance in this thread is simply astounding..........
User avatar
hamin_aus
Forum Moderator
Posts: 18363
Joined: 28 Aug 2003, 02:00
Processor: Intel i7 3770K
Motherboard: GA-Z77X-UP4 TH
Graphics card: Galax GTX1080
Memory: 32GB G.Skill Ripjaws
Location: Where beer does flow and men chunder
Contact:

Post by hamin_aus »

QBM wrote:holy ****.............do you people ever look anything up before you start typing? The ignorance in this thread is simply astounding..........
w00t!
QBM is back.
Please enlighten us, dude .
Image
Ike
Registered User
Posts: 3800
Joined: 16 Jun 2006, 02:00
Location: Potgietersrus

Post by Ike »

jamin_za wrote:Even if they have built one - they have not successfully tested it AFAIK.

:arrow: http://www.chernobyl.info/index.php?navID=2

The intial fallout zone from the Chernobyl meldown measured between 125 000 and 146 000 km2.
1. It's not much harder to build than a normal rocket. A spaceship, now that a bugger.

2.americas infantry sucks... In Iraq they ride outside the armor car. I mean WTH...

3.Chernobyl -> it a bit different than a normal nuke... A reactor meltdown cause wide spread radiation "dust" which was blown by the wind.

A nuke strike is basically a large area which is bombed. Like hiroshima, no nuclear dust was made. A bomb will only cause a radio active wave which will fade in days/months even... The direct area of the strike will have radiation damage for 1000 - 100 000 years.

->
Ike
Registered User
Posts: 3800
Joined: 16 Jun 2006, 02:00
Location: Potgietersrus

Post by Ike »

Chenobyl caused rather low radiation to europe, but england was radioactive anyways. (Before they knew of the dangers of radiactivity the english dumped waste in unsealed buckets and dumped it in the sea.)

In effect a ICBM strike that hits JHB won't even effect vereenigging. But a reactor meldown @ coeberg will affect places as far off as harare,north angola.
User avatar
hamin_aus
Forum Moderator
Posts: 18363
Joined: 28 Aug 2003, 02:00
Processor: Intel i7 3770K
Motherboard: GA-Z77X-UP4 TH
Graphics card: Galax GTX1080
Memory: 32GB G.Skill Ripjaws
Location: Where beer does flow and men chunder
Contact:

Post by hamin_aus »

Ike wrote:It's not much harder to build than a normal rocket.
Normal rockets dont need enough fuel and a guidance system that will enable it to accurately hit a target on the other side of the world (Look up the definition of ICBM - I know China can reach Russia with it's current missile tech, but I was talking specifically about ICBMs)
Ike wrote:americas infantry sucks...
America's infantry are probably the most well-trained in the world - as is every branch of their armed forces. If they have a hard time in a desert, you can bet your girlfriends goodies that China will too.
Ike wrote:Chernobyl -> it a bit different than a normal nuke... A reactor meltdown cause wide spread radiation "dust" which was blown by the wind.

---

A nuke strike is basically a large area which is bombed. Like hiroshima, no nuclear dust was made. A bomb will only cause a radio active wave which will fade in days/months even... The direct area of the strike will have radiation damage for 1000 - 100 000 years.
A very valid point, but you are assuming China will nuke Moscow and that will be that. If China were to use nukes, they would lauch many. Some targetting military assets, others targetting civilian assets. As soon as Russia are aware of these missiles, they will lauch a counter strike of their own. I have no doubt both countries have already simulated this scenario and know what would happen.

Lets be conservative and say 20 nuclear explosions over Russia and China (10 each) now we have enough nuclear waste to talk seriously about fallout. And also a nuclear winter.
Image
QBM
Registered User
Posts: 1850
Joined: 19 Jul 2005, 02:00

Post by QBM »

Ike wrote:Chenobyl caused rather low radiation to europe, but england was radioactive anyways. (Before they knew of the dangers of radiactivity the english dumped waste in unsealed buckets and dumped it in the sea.)

In effect a ICBM strike that hits JHB won't even effect vereenigging. But a reactor meldown @ coeberg will affect places as far off as harare,north angola.
Are you smoking crack or just trying to piss jamin off?

FYI:
A 1 megaton warhead would produce deadly fallout at 150+ miles away with a surface blast.........you can control the point of detonation to create such effects.......
QBM
Registered User
Posts: 1850
Joined: 19 Jul 2005, 02:00

Post by QBM »

Ike wrote:anyway there was a documentary made to show how corrupt he is.
ooooooo....a documentary.....well then it must be true. :roll:
Ike wrote:could have as much as 100 000 live war heads. 8O - but everybody is to afraid to ask them, just like chinese piracy - too afraid :lol:
China has less than 500 warheads. Very few of which are strategic.
QBM
Registered User
Posts: 1850
Joined: 19 Jul 2005, 02:00

Post by QBM »

jamin_za wrote: I believe they have alot of nukes. They're problem is not lack of Nukes, it's lack of a delivery platform.
China has had ICBMs with 7000+ mile ranges since the 70s.
User avatar
hamin_aus
Forum Moderator
Posts: 18363
Joined: 28 Aug 2003, 02:00
Processor: Intel i7 3770K
Motherboard: GA-Z77X-UP4 TH
Graphics card: Galax GTX1080
Memory: 32GB G.Skill Ripjaws
Location: Where beer does flow and men chunder
Contact:

Post by hamin_aus »

Would a 7000 mile range be enough to to reach the west coast of America? My geography sucks...
Image
QBM
Registered User
Posts: 1850
Joined: 19 Jul 2005, 02:00

Post by QBM »

jamin_za wrote:Would a 7000 mile range be enough to to reach the west coast of America? My geography sucks...
Yes......it could hit almost anywhere in the US. Remember you can go over the poles too. ;)

I actually meant kilometers earlier. The range of current Dong Feng-5s is ~ 7000 miles
User avatar
hamin_aus
Forum Moderator
Posts: 18363
Joined: 28 Aug 2003, 02:00
Processor: Intel i7 3770K
Motherboard: GA-Z77X-UP4 TH
Graphics card: Galax GTX1080
Memory: 32GB G.Skill Ripjaws
Location: Where beer does flow and men chunder
Contact:

Post by hamin_aus »

Ah, yes - of course :oops:

So who do yourate as a bigger instigator, QBM, China or North Korea?
I know the Chinese might follow Kim Jung into whatever fight he picks, but is China just as likely to start something as he is?
Image
QBM
Registered User
Posts: 1850
Joined: 19 Jul 2005, 02:00

Post by QBM »

jamin_za wrote:Ah, yes - of course :oops:

So who do yourate as a bigger instigator, QBM, China or North Korea?
I know the Chinese might follow Kim Jung into whatever fight he picks, but is China just as likely to start something as he is?
I really don't see China as an instigator although they seem to be building up to retake Taiwan. I don't see them following Kim Jung either. They really don't support him but they don't want the refugees or US involvement so they will continue to pressure NK.

Kim Jung is insane and is most likely to try to bring about a conflict but I don't see him succeeding short of attacking SK.
Ike
Registered User
Posts: 3800
Joined: 16 Jun 2006, 02:00
Location: Potgietersrus

Post by Ike »

jamin_za wrote:Normal rockets dont need enough fuel and a guidance system that will enable it to accurately hit a target on the other side of the world (Look up the definition of ICBM - I know China can reach Russia with it's current missile tech, but I was talking specifically about ICBMs)

2)---A very valid point, but you are assuming China will nuke Moscow and that will be that. If China were to use nukes, they would lauch many. Some targetting military assets, others targetting civilian assets. A

Lets be conservative and say 20 nuclear explosions over Russia and China (10 each) now we have enough nuclear waste to talk seriously about fallout. And also a
1- a rocket can also be laser targeted. V92 rockets for example was created by the nazi's and were targeting london using radar tech in the 1940's.

2-It depends where the nuke is detonated. 1 mile/500m /50 m. No chinese man is crazy enough to detonate a nuke 5 miles up.

And you don't target military assets with nukes. Only large cities. Military bases are striked by normal missiles, becuase it will be like hitting a fly with a gun.

No cities, no war.
Ike
Registered User
Posts: 3800
Joined: 16 Jun 2006, 02:00
Location: Potgietersrus

Post by Ike »

QBM wrote:
Ike wrote:Chenobyl caused rather low radiation to europe, but england was radioactive anyways. (Before they knew of the dangers of radiactivity the english dumped waste in unsealed buckets and dumped it in the sea.)

In effect a ICBM strike that hits JHB won't even effect vereenigging. But a reactor meldown @ coeberg will affect places as far off as harare,north angola.
Are you smoking crack or just trying to piss jamin off?

FYI:
A 1 megaton warhead would produce deadly fallout at 150+ miles away with a surface blast.........you can control the point of detonation to create such effects.......
Ye, I'm smoking tha good ****...

A 1 megaton warhead with a fallout of 150+ miles? are you stupid. :?:
More like 150KM not miles... hell, thats 300km.

Or maybe they'll activate it in the stratos sphere? boom! kill everyone!

:roll:
capanno
Registered User
Posts: 5727
Joined: 17 Apr 2004, 02:00
Location: PTA
Contact:

Post by capanno »

Its more like 200 km.
Image
Josh Dies is my hero! |50,000,601.375 forum points
Ike
Registered User
Posts: 3800
Joined: 16 Jun 2006, 02:00
Location: Potgietersrus

Post by Ike »

capanno wrote:Its more like 200 km.
As I said... depends where you detonate it.
QBM
Registered User
Posts: 1850
Joined: 19 Jul 2005, 02:00

Post by QBM »

Ike wrote:
QBM wrote:
Ike wrote:Chenobyl caused rather low radiation to europe, but england was radioactive anyways. (Before they knew of the dangers of radiactivity the english dumped waste in unsealed buckets and dumped it in the sea.)

In effect a ICBM strike that hits JHB won't even effect vereenigging. But a reactor meldown @ coeberg will affect places as far off as harare,north angola.
Are you smoking crack or just trying to piss jamin off?

FYI:
A 1 megaton warhead would produce deadly fallout at 150+ miles away with a surface blast.........you can control the point of detonation to create such effects.......
Ye, I'm smoking tha good ****...

A 1 megaton warhead with a fallout of 150+ miles? are you stupid. :?:
More like 150KM not miles... hell, thats 300km.

Or maybe they'll activate it in the stratos sphere? boom! kill everyone!

:roll:
Well at first I thought you were just enjoying a toke.....turns out you are an idiot.

Since I'm tired and don't have time to play with you:


1 Megaton Surface Blast: Fallout
Assumptions
Wind speed: 15 mph
Wind direction: due east
Time frame: 7 days

3,000 Rem*
Distance: 30 miles
Much more than a lethal dose of radiation. Death can occur within hours of exposure. About 10 years will need to pass before levels of radioactivity in this area drop low enough to be considered safe, by U.S. peacetime standards.

900 Rem
Distance: 90 miles
A lethal dose of radiation. Death occurs from two to fourteen days.

300 Rem
Distance: 160 miles
Causes extensive internal damage, including harm to nerve cells and the cells that line the digestive tract, and results in a loss of white blood cells. Temporary hair loss is another result.

90 Rem
Distance: 250 miles
Causes a temporary decrease in white blood cells, although there are no immediate harmful effects. Two to three years will need to pass before radioactivity levels in this area drop low enough to be considered safe, by U.S. peacetime standards.

*Rem: Stands for “roentgen equivalent man.” This is a measurement used to quantify the amount of radiation that will produce certain biological effects.




There are many fallout calculators on the web......you should try one.....
Law
Registered User
Posts: 1569
Joined: 12 Sep 2003, 02:00
Location: UND

Post by Law »

I've recently as of 2 mins ago decidied on the best way to resolve this conflict.

They should get all the guys from 1 side of the complex and put them with all the females of the other side of the complex and visa versa and they should all make babies sothat all future generations are a 50/50 mix and make the 2 countries 1 and put and already 50/50mix person in power

:D

gl hf
Image

MAY THE CHEESE BE WITH YOU!
{PK} Law
Ike
Registered User
Posts: 3800
Joined: 16 Jun 2006, 02:00
Location: Potgietersrus

Post by Ike »

QBM wrote: There are many fallout calculators on the web......you should try one.....
Are you stupid? no really? "I'z sees tha website with tzee calculationss"

I had my dad take a look at your crappy figures, and through his laughing he asked: "will there be winds blowing @ 300mph..."

I kinda think he knows what he's talking about, because he worked in the mines as a Radio Active Control Specialist.

He also said that the fact that there's no way that you can even calculate the effect's of radiation after a atomic boom, yet alone before.
Ike
Registered User
Posts: 3800
Joined: 16 Jun 2006, 02:00
Location: Potgietersrus

Post by Ike »

This is hiroshima.

At least 11 U.S. POWs also died.[12] The radius of total destruction was about 1.6 km (1 mile), with resulting fires across 11.4 square km (4.4 square miles).[13] Infrastructure damage was estimated at 90% of Hiroshima's buildings being either damaged or completely destroyed.

nagasaki

This was nearly 3 kilometers (2 mi) northwest of the planned hypocenter; the blast was confined to the Urakami Valley and a major portion of the city was protected by the intervening hills.[27] The resulting explosion converted about 1 g of mass into energy with an equivalent blast yield of 21 kilotons of TNT

this in effect concludes that an ICBM's X 10 and won't destroy half of the world :roll:
capanno
Registered User
Posts: 5727
Joined: 17 Apr 2004, 02:00
Location: PTA
Contact:

Post by capanno »

Israeli ( I assume laser guided ) missile owning a hezbolla vehicle.

Click here to watch Israeli-Missile
Image
Josh Dies is my hero! |50,000,601.375 forum points
Post Reply