The Cricket Thread
Forum rules
The global forum rules are found here.
NOTE: posts in this section are not counted towards your total.
The global forum rules are found here.
NOTE: posts in this section are not counted towards your total.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 12411
- Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
- Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...
Re: The Cricket Thread
I'm inclined to agree that Australia has the best attack in world cricket at the moment. You might think that sounds crazy, but although we may have the two best bowlers in Steyn and Philander, we can't match Australia for balance and depth. Apart from Johnson, Siddle, Harris and Lyon, just look at the bowlers that they DIDN'T use:
- James Pattinson
- Mitchell Starc
- Jackson Bird
- Ben Hilfenhaus
I mean Steven Smith hardly ever bowls. If he played for SA, he'd bowl about 20 overs per innings! It saddens me that Imran Tahir isn't having the impact he's supposed to, although being dropped one game after match figures of 8 / 130 really doesn't make any sense.
- James Pattinson
- Mitchell Starc
- Jackson Bird
- Ben Hilfenhaus
I mean Steven Smith hardly ever bowls. If he played for SA, he'd bowl about 20 overs per innings! It saddens me that Imran Tahir isn't having the impact he's supposed to, although being dropped one game after match figures of 8 / 130 really doesn't make any sense.
Re: The Cricket Thread
All I can think is that having an extra batsman is more important to the selectors than having an actual spinner. Peterson is effective as a bowler when batsmen are attacking him and getting themselves out, but pretty useless otherwise. But he can bat. Tahir should certainly be given more of an opportunity, but he can't bat.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 12411
- Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
- Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...
Re: The Cricket Thread
At test level you shouldn't be picking bits-and-pieces cricketers. You should be picking players who are specialists in what they do, not ones who do okay-ish at both.Stuart wrote:All I can think is that having an extra batsman is more important to the selectors than having an actual spinner. Peterson is effective as a bowler when batsmen are attacking him and getting themselves out, but pretty useless otherwise. But he can bat. Tahir should certainly be given more of an opportunity, but he can't bat.
Re: The Cricket Thread
Like Johan Botha? *hides*Mystical_Titan wrote:not ones who do okay-ish at both.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 12411
- Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
- Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...
Re: The Cricket Thread
I WILL find you...Stuart wrote:Like Johan Botha? *hides*Mystical_Titan wrote:not ones who do okay-ish at both.
Re: The Cricket Thread
Saw Johan Botha playing in the big bash, think he is injured now. He is a very good option for T20's and ODI but never for Tests, I would rather get Kallis out of retirement and choose him as a spin bowler
I am a guy so please people stop sending me these shady pm's and start playing computer games or bodybuilding. Forums aren't a good place to get chicks the gym is...
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 12411
- Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
- Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...
Re: The Cricket Thread
LOL! I don't think THAT'S going happen.Tiza wrote:I would rather get Kallis out of retirement and choose him as a spin bowler
I would pick Johan Botha over Robin Peterson every single day of the week and twice on Sundays. Robin Peterson IS NOT test cricket material.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 20732
- Joined: 13 Sep 2004, 02:00
- Location: Cruising the streets of Pretoria
- Contact:
Re: The Cricket Thread
Yeah, I'm not a fan of Robbie Flair, but his batting has saved our butts numerous timesMystical_Titan wrote:LOL! I don't think THAT'S going happen.Tiza wrote:I would rather get Kallis out of retirement and choose him as a spin bowler
I would pick Johan Botha over Robin Peterson every single day of the week and twice on Sundays. Robin Peterson IS NOT test cricket material.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 12411
- Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
- Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...
Re: The Cricket Thread
Has anyone watched this? Eina!
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 12411
- Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
- Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...
Re: The Cricket Thread
I think this idea certainly has merit, but there may be very strong resistance from some camps.
ICC mulls two-tier Test cricket
ICC mulls two-tier Test cricket
Re: The Cricket Thread
I like it.
Re: The Cricket Thread
I hope you guys watched the Ram Slam T20 game between the Cobras and Titans. One of the most epic finishes I have seen, funny how things can change in the matter of seconds. Still a fan of Parnell but he is way to erratic to back in the final over.
I am a guy so please people stop sending me these shady pm's and start playing computer games or bodybuilding. Forums aren't a good place to get chicks the gym is...
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 12411
- Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
- Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...
Re: The Cricket Thread
I'm more worried about the state of umpiring as a whole. Why is it that they always check the bowler's feet when he's taken a wicket? Then in some replays you see that half his foot is still behind the line and then you have to wonder how many other no-balls the umpires are missing when a wicket hasn't gone down.Tiza wrote:I hope you guys watched the Ram Slam T20 game between the Cobras and Titans. One of the most epic finishes I have seen, funny how things can change in the matter of seconds. Still a fan of Parnell but he is way to erratic to back in the final over.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 12411
- Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
- Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...
Re: The Cricket Thread
I think England can stop playing cricket now. They couldn't take the last wicket with more than 50 runs still in the bank and then Bresnan goes and bowls short in the last over with Australia just needing 12 to win.
Re: The Cricket Thread
Poor sods.Mystical_Titan wrote:I think England can stop playing cricket now. They couldn't take the last wicket with more than 50 runs still in the bank and then Bresnan goes and bowls short in the last over with Australia just needing 12 to win.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle
Intel i5 2500; AsRock Z77 Extreme 4; Asus GTX580; 4x 2GB DDR3 1333; Intel 520 240GB SSD + 2x WD 3TB + 2TB Samsung; Samsung 22X DVD/RW; 23" LG W2343T-PF; Huntkey 700W
Intel i5 2500; AsRock Z77 Extreme 4; Asus GTX580; 4x 2GB DDR3 1333; Intel 520 240GB SSD + 2x WD 3TB + 2TB Samsung; Samsung 22X DVD/RW; 23" LG W2343T-PF; Huntkey 700W
Re: The Cricket Thread
Boycott reckons they should only play test cricket for the rest of the year. No ODIs. No T20.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 12411
- Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
- Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...
Re: The Cricket Thread
I think Boycott values his own opinion much more highly than anyone else does.Stuart wrote:Boycott reckons they should only play test cricket for the rest of the year. No ODIs. No T20.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 12411
- Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
- Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...
Re: The Cricket Thread
Boycott talks too much. Playing only tests is certainly not the answer.WiK1d wrote:Boycott knows what's up
Re: The Cricket Thread
Depends on what you want to accomplish.Mystical_Titan wrote:Boycott talks too much. Playing only tests is certainly not the answer.WiK1d wrote:Boycott knows what's up
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 12411
- Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
- Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...
Re: The Cricket Thread
Look at South Africa. Sure, they haven't been fantastic in ODI and T20 cricket over the last two years, but they're slowly getting into the groove again and have been playing well of late. England's problems have nothing to do with them playing too much ODI / T20 cricket and not enough test cricket. Their problems go much deeper. That's why a change of format has done nothing for their fortunes. Australia are all over them like white on rice.Stuart wrote:Depends on what you want to accomplish.
Re: The Cricket Thread
I don't think the point is that they play too much limited overs stuff. I think Boycott's point is that they currently suck at everything, and rather than trying to get all three formats right at once, they should focus on one at a time. As an old time cricketer, naturally his attention is on getting the tests right first.Mystical_Titan wrote:Look at South Africa. Sure, they haven't been fantastic in ODI and T20 cricket over the last two years, but they're slowly getting into the groove again and have been playing well of late. England's problems have nothing to do with them playing too much ODI / T20 cricket and not enough test cricket. Their problems go much deeper. That's why a change of format has done nothing for their fortunes. Australia are all over them like white on rice.Stuart wrote:Depends on what you want to accomplish.
There may be a glimmer of merit in his thinking, but it's wishful thinking to imagine that any test-status team in the contemporary cricketing climate could get away with playing only one format.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 12411
- Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
- Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...
Re: The Cricket Thread
I'm afraid in today's cricketing world, that is not any kind of possibility. Boycott was a run machine in his time, but sometimes I find his opinions a touch old fashioned.Stuart wrote:There may be a glimmer of merit in his thinking, but it's wishful thinking to imagine that any test-status team in the contemporary cricketing climate could get away with playing only one format.
Re: The Cricket Thread
That seems to be true of most cricketers who played prior to the 90s. And of most English cricketers.Mystical_Titan wrote:I find his opinions a touch old fashioned.
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 12411
- Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
- Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...
Re: The Cricket Thread
Although, truth be told, I'd much rather listen to Boycott than Ravi 'I'm-God's-Gift-To-Cricket Shastri'.Stuart wrote:That seems to be true of most cricketers who played prior to the 90s. And of most English cricketers.Mystical_Titan wrote:I find his opinions a touch old fashioned.