The Cricket Thread

Sport discussions.
Forum rules
The global forum rules are found here.

NOTE: posts in this section are not counted towards your total.
Mystical_Titan
Registered User
Posts: 12411
Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Mystical_Titan »

It's very unlike them. Zim should try and keep Australia below 250. Going to be hard work though. Viva the underdogs!
Mystical_Titan
Registered User
Posts: 12411
Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Mystical_Titan »

Australia finishing on 262 for 6. Going to be a tough ask for Zimbabwe, but not impossible...
User avatar
Stuart
Lead Forum Administrator
Posts: 38503
Joined: 19 May 2005, 02:00
Location: Home

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Stuart »

Chigumbura (sp?) suggested he would be happy to chase 270. I have a suspicion that they will fall well short.
Image
Mystical_Titan
Registered User
Posts: 12411
Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Mystical_Titan »

Mmm... who knows? Australia don't have spinners that will knock your socks off and everyone's going on about how slow the pitches are.
User avatar
Stuart
Lead Forum Administrator
Posts: 38503
Joined: 19 May 2005, 02:00
Location: Home

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Stuart »

Does it strike anyone else as slightly amusing that Zim's opening batsman is a guy by the name of Charles Coventry? I'll bet he wasn't Bob's first choice. :lol:
Image
CapNemo
Registered User
Posts: 49984
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 21:55
Location: Searching for a way back throught the lookingglass

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by CapNemo »

:lol: that is rather interesting
"I hear voices in my head but they are my own this time"
"Except for a battle lost, there is nothing so terrible as a battle won."
"Sanity is for the weak!!"
User avatar
Stuart
Lead Forum Administrator
Posts: 38503
Joined: 19 May 2005, 02:00
Location: Home

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Stuart »

Lulz, I have to see the highlights when I get home.
Johnson to Ervine, no run, he's been hit, Ervine lost sight of that short ball and wore it on the grill of the helmet.

There's been a review for an lbw appeal from Johnson.
:lol:
Image
Mystical_Titan
Registered User
Posts: 12411
Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Mystical_Titan »

Stuart wrote:Does it strike anyone else as slightly amusing that Zim's opening batsman is a guy by the name of Charles Coventry? I'll bet he wasn't Bob's first choice. :lol:
Obviously I missed something...

Netherlands are sticking it to England with the bat, they are 199 for 4 after 41 overs! I hope we see an upset today.
Mystical_Titan
Registered User
Posts: 12411
Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Mystical_Titan »

Awesome! Ryan Ten Doeschate has a century and Netherlands are 239 for 5 against England after 45 overs!
User avatar
Stuart
Lead Forum Administrator
Posts: 38503
Joined: 19 May 2005, 02:00
Location: Home

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Stuart »

Mystical_Titan wrote:
Stuart wrote:Does it strike anyone else as slightly amusing that Zim's opening batsman is a guy by the name of Charles Coventry? I'll bet he wasn't Bob's first choice. :lol:
Obviously I missed something...
It's just such an English name for such an English-hating country.
Mystical_Titan wrote:Netherlands are sticking it to England with the bat, they are 199 for 4 after 41 overs! I hope we see an upset today.
I've never seen a batsman go to a century with a 5 before. This ten Doeschate character seems quite the talent.
Image
Mystical_Titan
Registered User
Posts: 12411
Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Mystical_Titan »

He's their biggest player. Check out his ODI average, even though lots of his games are against other associate countries. He scored a 70-odd against SA in the 2007 World Cup.
Mystical_Titan
Registered User
Posts: 12411
Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Mystical_Titan »

England are imploding here. Anderson just bowled two no-balls in one over and both were called for being above the batman's waist.
User avatar
KatrynKat
Insane in the Membrane
Posts: 24490
Joined: 18 Jul 2010, 17:42
Location: In my BDSM dungeon - aka Lockdown

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by KatrynKat »

//good to see my people can play cricket... :)
"This eBook is displayed using 100% recycled electrons."
User avatar
Stuart
Lead Forum Administrator
Posts: 38503
Joined: 19 May 2005, 02:00
Location: Home

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Stuart »

Has anyone else noticed that the UDRS only checks for front-foot no-balls? Technically, a bowler coming too wide of the crease could get away with a no-ball wicket if they only check for front-foot no-balls. Not that I have any particular Australian fast bowler in mind or anything.
Image
User avatar
Stuart
Lead Forum Administrator
Posts: 38503
Joined: 19 May 2005, 02:00
Location: Home

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Stuart »

Prior's having a bit of a shocker today, isn't he?
Image
User avatar
Stuart
Lead Forum Administrator
Posts: 38503
Joined: 19 May 2005, 02:00
Location: Home

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Stuart »

Lol, this game has everything. England no-balled for having insufficient fielders in the circle. And on a wicket ball to boot! :lol:
Image
Mystical_Titan
Registered User
Posts: 12411
Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Mystical_Titan »

Yip... not a good day for them. The umpire would notice if the bowler came too wide of the crease, it's just standard for the UDRS to check the no-ball.
User avatar
Stuart
Lead Forum Administrator
Posts: 38503
Joined: 19 May 2005, 02:00
Location: Home

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Stuart »

Mystical_Titan wrote:Yip... not a good day for them. The umpire would notice if the bowler came too wide of the crease, it's just standard for the UDRS to check the no-ball.
I've seen umpires miss no balls for bowlers coming in too wide. Happened a few times with Klusener that I can remember. Surely if they reviewing umpire is going to check he should check for everything.
Image
lancelot
Registered User
Posts: 7162
Joined: 13 May 2003, 02:00
Location: Cape Town

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by lancelot »

292, nor bad, not bad at all.
Mystical_Titan
Registered User
Posts: 12411
Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Mystical_Titan »

I hope Netherlands win this... they just need their bowlers to come to the party.
Mystical_Titan
Registered User
Posts: 12411
Joined: 19 Mar 2004, 02:00
Location: Journeying towards the Dark Tower...

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Mystical_Titan »

Netherlands not bowling very well...
Rajiv
Registered User
Posts: 2178
Joined: 03 Dec 2010, 20:26

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Rajiv »

You like Netherlands?
"Because I don't say it...don't mean I ain't thinking it!"
User avatar
KatrynKat
Insane in the Membrane
Posts: 24490
Joined: 18 Jul 2010, 17:42
Location: In my BDSM dungeon - aka Lockdown

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by KatrynKat »

Go Netherlands Go!!!
luv it when a game goes to the last minute to decide who wins.... very exciting... :)
"This eBook is displayed using 100% recycled electrons."
User avatar
KatrynKat
Insane in the Membrane
Posts: 24490
Joined: 18 Jul 2010, 17:42
Location: In my BDSM dungeon - aka Lockdown

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by KatrynKat »

oh no.... ag wat.... it was a good game...
"This eBook is displayed using 100% recycled electrons."
Sojourn
Registered User
Posts: 5649
Joined: 02 Sep 2004, 02:00
Location: Still looking...

Re: The Cricket Thread

Post by Sojourn »

Went down to the 2nd last over, but sadly the dutch never looked dangerous.
Post Reply