Picture Of The Day, discuss if you really must

[lancelot]

Now why can you guys post links to that site? When I did I got a warning.

I think fair is fair - you should both get warnings for this What is good for the goose - is good for the gander

Spoiler: (show)

I Agree

[Stuart]

I think anyone who posts large red text in this thread rather than pictures should also get a warning.

That said, although I missed the links, I'll support any initiative that will result in Prime being issued a warning.

[lancelot]

Warning removed. I am a bit nonplussed to say the least.

[Tribble]

Well I suppose you did remove my warning after all the attention I got. So I guess you really don't want to feed Prime's need for attention

[RuadRauFlessa]

Well after a discussion in the mod lounge Jamin got himself a change of title ...

[lancelot]

Well I suppose you did remove my warning after all the attention I got. So I guess you really don't want to feed Prime's need for attention

You did it in innocence Tribs, so it was removed, with the Prime, jamin or whatever there is some clarity lacking, so all got away with it, but next time, well,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Also Ruad nuked the post quite early without too much harm being done, as to jamins reference to me, that is actually your fault jamin claims that one of the octogenarians looks like me. I then went to have a look at the site but before I could find the so called pic I came across a baboons bum, a splitting image of jamin, also found an actual picture of him posing.

[Tribble]

Well after a discussion in the mod lounge Jamin got himself a change of title ...

Bwahahahahahaha suits him

[Tribble]

Well I suppose you did remove my warning after all the attention I got. So I guess you really don't want to feed Prime's need for attention

You did it in innocence Tribs, so it was removed, with the Prime, jamin or whatever there is some clarity lacking, so all got away with it, but next time, well,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Also Ruad nuked the post quite early without too much harm being done, as to jamins reference to me, that is actually your fault jamin claims that one of the octogenarians looks like me. I then went to have a look at the site but before I could find the so called pic I came across a baboons ****, a splitting image of jamin, also found an actual picture of him posing.

pic sadly deleted as I am not allowed to quote them here - the puppy bites your shins if you do

Haa haa haa. I need to see that photo of Jamin - but would I be correct in thinking that any baboons **** would do?

[lancelot]

You are correct!

[doo_much]

I think they found the skeleton of that law student friend of yours Lancelot...

[hamin_aus]

No, sorry, blocking out two letters with special characters does not count as removing profanity. - The Rat

How about blocking out 3 letters, you ***k? - jamin

I dunno. Try it and see what happens. - The Rat

[ADT]

[Tel]

[Frozenfireside]

Syndrome.jpg and
No, sorry, blocking out two letters with special characters does not count as removing profanity. - The Rat

How about blocking out 3 letters, you ***k? - jamin

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAhaahahah!
Prawned.

[ADT]

Lolz

[VoxynQueen]

What is all the fuss about swearing?
Are you seriously going to stand by the imbecilic excuse that children that don't know how to swear (which do NOT exist above the age of ten years) use this forum?

[fallen_angel]

What is all the fuss about swearing?
Are you seriously going to stand by the imbecilic excuse that children that don't know how to swear (which do NOT exist above the age of ten years) use this forum?

If we allow every person to swear at free will it will degrade the standard we have set on our forum and we would become like any other 2nd grade forum out there. what would be the point of having our forum then?

[Stuart]

What is all the fuss about swearing?
Are you seriously going to stand by the imbecilic excuse that children that don't know how to swear (which do NOT exist above the age of ten years) use this forum?

Whether you like it or not, it's in the rules. Until the PCF staff change it, it remains in the rules.

Personally, I don't care how widespready swearing is. If you are incapable of maintaining a conversation without the use of profanity you have a serious lack of grasp of the English language.

Believe it or not, there are actually people who don't like swearing. I have never encountered, on the other hand, someone who is offended by another's lack of swearing.

[rustypup]

I have never encountered, on the other hand, someone who is offended by another's lack of swearing.

except steve... but [complicated pictogram] him and his fancy-schmancy firestick...

it's in the rules... it's not open for review... (especially not in this thread)... why the agonising over it?

in the immortal words of benjamin... post pics or kindly fornicate off...

[lancelot]

Yes indeed, in short and jerky movements!

[StarBound]

I think we should get Stuart into parlement. Then we can get this country running again.

[Frozenfireside]

At least horrible pesticides will be banned then...

[Prime]

What is all the fuss about swearing?
Are you seriously going to stand by the imbecilic excuse that children that don't know how to swear (which do NOT exist above the age of ten years) use this forum?

If we allow every person to swear at free will it will degrade the standard we have set on our forum and we would become like any other 2nd grade forum out there. what would be the point of having our forum then?

Actually, there are plenty of forums where swearing is allowed and their forums have not degraded to second rate. The fact that this forum would degrade into a seocnd rate place if swearing was allowed, says more about the users.

[VoxynQueen]

Whether you like it or not, it's in the rules. Until the PCF staff change it, it remains in the rules.

Personally, I don't care how widespready swearing is. If you are incapable of maintaining a conversation without the use of profanity you have a serious lack of grasp of the English language.

Believe it or not, there are actually people who don't like swearing. I have never encountered, on the other hand, someone who is offended by another's lack of swearing.

I can see why you're a moderator.
Even attempting to question a 'rule' must be one of the prerequisites.

Just because people are free to swear as and when they want does not automatically mean that a conversation is impossible nor does it mean that the exchange of words will be vulgar, rude and devoid of all humour.
After all, in real life we are all free to swear at each other. Yet, somehow we are also able to maintain pleasurable conversations.

Who cares about being offended?
Nothing that anyone says, does or thinks about me ON THE INTERNET is going to get my panties in a twist.


Basically I am suggesting that a review of this rule should be conducted.
Possibly leading to a rule change.
Although seeing as this is an official forum to some sort of business or something I don't see it happening.

[fallen_angel]

Whether you like it or not, it's in the rules. Until the PCF staff change it, it remains in the rules.

Personally, I don't care how widespready swearing is. If you are incapable of maintaining a conversation without the use of profanity you have a serious lack of grasp of the English language.

Believe it or not, there are actually people who don't like swearing. I have never encountered, on the other hand, someone who is offended by another's lack of swearing.

I can see why you're a moderator.
Even attempting to question a 'rule' must be one of the prerequisites.

Just because people are free to swear as and when they want does not automatically mean that a conversation is impossible nor does it mean that the exchange of words will be vulgar, rude and devoid of all humour.
After all, in real life we are all free to swear at each other. Yet, somehow we are also able to maintain pleasurable conversations.

Who cares about being offended?
Nothing that anyone says, does or thinks about me ON THE INTERNET is going to get my panties in a twist.


Basically I am suggesting that a review of this rule should be conducted.
Possibly leading to a rule change.
Although seeing as this is an official forum to some sort of business or something I don't see it happening.

This forum is a direct image of the magazine so any profanity would be degrading towards the magazine and that is why the rule has been stated and WILL NOT be changed