Page 1 of 1

2010 - Least Intelligible Member

Posted: 17 Oct 2010, 22:09
by Ron2K
We have in this category:
  • 123456
  • KALSTER
  • StoneIce

Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member

Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 06:03
by Tribble
What is Kalster's name doing here?

Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member

Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 06:27
by jee
you can ask that again..... i think someone missed the "least" part...

Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member

Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 06:29
by CapNemo
Maybe someone who doesn't understand what he said or a personal feud?

Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member

Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 06:38
by Tribble
Yeah - strange that. I would never have put him here. Personally I don't like this thread

Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member

Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 07:42
by wizardofid
Tribble wrote:Yeah - strange that. I would never have put him here. Personally I don't like this thread
Every village needs an idiot it just so happens that another idiot decided to vote for the wrong person, this should get that person the title automatically... :wink:

Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member

Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 07:53
by doo_much
The award is for Least Intelligible Member. Not Least Intelligent Member.

Else we'd have nominated STD. ;)

Maybe what he says is just totally incomprehensible to one of the other forumites?

Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member

Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 07:56
by KALSTER
I do sometimes write as if the sentence order was chosen randomly.:)

Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member

Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 09:49
by ADT
doo_much wrote:The award is for Least Intelligible Member. Not Least Intelligent Member.

Else we'd have nominated STD. ;)

Maybe what he says is just totally incomprehensible to one of the other forumites?

:shock:

Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member

Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 10:11
by rustypup
i believe the issue may be that KALSTER sometimes uses the most confusing of literary devices out there...

the dreaded Paragraph!...

given that few, if any, internet users have the short-term memory retention required to process a sentence consisting of more than 7 words, this nomination is entirely believable.... wrong, but understandable...

Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member

Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 10:15
by ADT
StoneIce will anyway "Win" KALSTER so don't be alarmed, if anyone has been to the afr thread - you'd understand :facepalm:

Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member

Posted: 18 Oct 2010, 10:16
by D3PART3D
Kalster was probably just a joke nomination. Someone didn't want stoned-ice to feel lonely.

Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member

Posted: 19 Oct 2010, 20:17
by DeathPing
This Award totally sucks! :thumbdown:

It should be removed, imho. :x

Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member

Posted: 19 Oct 2010, 20:21
by doo_much
Your opinion doesn't count.

Nou sharrup en gaan stem vir Klippies! :twisted:

Re: 2010 - Least Intelligible Member

Posted: 18 Mar 2016, 16:35
by GDI_Lord
I think this is posted in the wrong section...


Also, Belarus? Are you related to the more famous Cameron that hasn't been seen here for a while?