Search found 4 matches
- 15 Feb 2012, 13:59
- Forum: Benchmarking
- Topic: 3DMark 11
- Replies: 148
- Views: 17428
Re: 3DMark 11
double post
- 15 Feb 2012, 13:56
- Forum: Benchmarking
- Topic: 3DMark 11
- Replies: 148
- Views: 17428
Re: 3DMark 11
Hahah, no 1.392 is low man. Nothign dangerous about that really. Just need to watch the temps. Keep in mind as well that the CPU Vcore is dependant on many other things, so while a high Vcore is certainly not a good idea. less than 1.45 or even 1.5V is ok provided it's not 24/7 setting, the cooling ...
- 15 Feb 2012, 12:21
- Forum: Benchmarking
- Topic: 3DMark 11
- Replies: 148
- Views: 17428
Re: 3DMark 11
It's mine and no I'm not StarBound.
Finally getting the hang of this but the score is still lower than it should be. So there's something I'm missing obviously. I'd like to see 24K next at lower GPU speeds because it is possible. I think
Finally getting the hang of this but the score is still lower than it should be. So there's something I'm missing obviously. I'd like to see 24K next at lower GPU speeds because it is possible. I think
- 14 Feb 2012, 14:29
- Forum: Benchmarking
- Topic: 3DMark 11
- Replies: 148
- Views: 17428
